Liana Wang is a student at Harvard Law School.
In today’s news and commentary, Trump issues an EO on college sports, a second district court judge blocks the Department of Labor from winding down Job Corps, and Safeway workers in California reach a tentative agreement.
On Thursday, President Trump announced an executive order titled “Saving College Sports,” which declared it common sense that “college sports are not, and should not be, professional sports.” As athletes have sought to redefine their relationship with their universities over the past few years, the NCAA and athletic conferences have lobbied Congress for a bill, the SCORE Act, that would provide them with antitrust protections and prevent student-athletes from being deemed employees. Although the bill currently lacks the bipartisan support it would need to pass both the House and Senate, President Trump’s EO pressures Congress to act. Moreover, it explicitly directs the NLRB to “clarify” the status of student athletes through “guidance, rules or other appropriate actions.” This directive will likely make it more difficult for student athletes to organize in any capacity.
On Friday, U.S. District Judge Dabney L. Friedrich granted the second preliminary injunction to block the Trump Administration from shutting down the Job Corps program, which provides not just workforce training, but also housing and medical care. The plaintiffs in Cabrera v. Department of Labor are a group of Job Corps students who challenged DOL’s actions under the APA. On the basis of those APA claims, Judge Friedrich granted a broader injunction on the basis of vacatur compared to a previous preliminary injunction granted in New York. In that case, brought by a group of Job Corps contractors who did not make APA claims, the district judge narrowed the injunction to cover only 31 of the 99 Job Corps centers after Trump v. CASA.
Lastly, in California, members of United Food and Commercial Workers reached a tentative agreement with Safeway after five months of negotiations and multiple threats to strike. Earlier this month, 95% of union members voted to approve a strike if a deal was not reached this weekend. If the strikes had taken place, they would have been one of the largest grocery strikes in Northern California in 30 years. The potential new contract includes higher wages, improved pension plans and work scheduling, and better health care benefits. Union members are slated to vote for ratification in the coming days. The new agreement follows previous UFCW negotiations in Southern California and Colorado, covered by Finlay earlier this month.
Daily News & Commentary
Start your day with our roundup of the latest labor developments. See all
January 29
Texas pauses H-1B hiring; NLRB General Counsel announces new procedures and priorities; Fourth Circuit rejects a teacher's challenge to pronoun policies.
January 28
Over 15,000 New York City nurses continue to strike with support from Mayor Mamdani; a judge grants a preliminary injunction that prevents DHS from ending family reunification parole programs for thousands of family members of U.S. citizens and green-card holders; and decisions in SDNY address whether employees may receive accommodations for telework due to potential exposure to COVID-19 when essential functions cannot be completed at home.
January 27
NYC's new delivery-app tipping law takes effect; 31,000 Kaiser Permanente nurses and healthcare workers go on strike; the NJ Appellate Division revives Atlantic City casino workers’ lawsuit challenging the state’s casino smoking exemption.
January 26
Unions mourn Alex Pretti, EEOC concentrates power, courts decide reach of EFAA.
January 25
Uber and Lyft face class actions against “women preference” matching, Virginia home healthcare workers push for a collective bargaining bill, and the NLRB launches a new intake protocol.
January 22
Hyundai’s labor union warns against the introduction of humanoid robots; Oregon and California trades unions take different paths to advocate for union jobs.