Everest Fang is a student at Harvard Law School.
In today’s news and commentary: Samsung union calls for indefinite strike, Disney may face the U.S.’s largest strike this year, and a court-appointed monitor reveals details of his investigation into Shawn Fain.
Yesterday, the National Samsung Electronics Union (NSEU) in South Korea called on its roughly 30,000 members to strike indefinitely, as part of its campaign for better pay and benefits. As Elyse wrote on Monday, the union initially planned to hold a three-day strike, with plans to commence a five-day action next week if the negotiations did not progress. The union said it decided to call for the indefinite action after management showed no intention of holding talks over the workers’ demands. NSEU also claimed that its actions had disrupted production, but Samsung has disputed this claim. This latest escalation comes just a month after the union staged the first walk out the company had ever experienced in its fifty-five year history.
Disney could face the nation’s largest strike this year after unions representing thousands of theme park and hotel workers in California announced that they will vote on whether to stage a walkout. The unions represent 14,000 “cast members” at Disneyland, Disney California Adventure, Downtown Disney and the Disney hotels. They accused Disney of “unlawful discipline and intimidation and surveillance” of union members, and called for an unfair labor practice strike vote to be held next week. The vote comes amid negotiations over a new union contract. The talks began in April and tensions quickly escalated when the unions filed unfair labor practice charges over cast members not being allowed to wear union buttons at work. The NLRB is now investigating alleged labor violations by the company. The strike vote is scheduled for July 19th.
On Monday, a court-appointed monitor disclosed that he was investigating accusations that Shawn Fain, president of UAW, retaliated against a vice president for resisting actions that would have benefited Fain’s domestic partner and her sister. The monitor, Neil Barofsky, made the disclosure in a court filing seeking access to internal union documents as part of his investigation. Since the investigation began in February, Barofsky and the union have clashed over how much access the monitor should have to union documents, and the pace at which the union has produced them. In Monday’s filing, Barofsky sought extensive access. Barofsky was appointed as part of a 2021 consent decree that ended a federal corruption case against the union. His investigation includes accusations that a regional director embezzled union funds, as well as the accusation involving Fain and his partner. Under Fain, UAW has won substantial wage and benefit increases, and successfully unionized a Volkswagen plant in Tennessee.
Daily News & Commentary
Start your day with our roundup of the latest labor developments. See all
January 20
In today’s news and commentary, SEIU advocates for a wealth tax, the DOL gets a budget increase, and the NLRB struggles with its workforce. The SEIU United Healthcare Workers West is advancing a California ballot initiative to impose a one-time 5% tax on personal wealth above $1 billion, aiming to raise funds for the state’s […]
January 19
Department of Education pauses wage garnishment; Valero Energy announces layoffs; Labor Department wins back wages for healthcare workers.
January 18
Met Museum workers unionize; a new report reveals a $0.76 average tip for gig workers in NYC; and U.S. workers receive the smallest share of capital since 1947.
January 16
The NLRB publishes its first decision since regaining a quorum; Minneapolis labor unions call for a general strike in response to the ICE killing of Renee Good; federal workers rally in DC to show support for the Protecting America’s Workforce Act.
January 15
New investigation into the Secretary of Labor; New Jersey bill to protect child content creators; NIOSH reinstates hundreds of employees.
January 14
The Supreme Court will not review its opt-in test in ADEA cases in an age discrimination and federal wage law violation case; the Fifth Circuit rules that a jury will determine whether Enterprise Products unfairly terminated a Black truck driver; and an employee at Berry Global Inc. will receive a trial after being fired for requesting medical leave for a disability-related injury.