Sophia is a student at Harvard Law School and a member of the Labor and Employment Lab.
In today’s news and commentary, multiple labor unions endorse a national general strike, and tech companies spend millions on ad campaigns for data centers.
Labor organizations in Minnesota and across the nation are organizing escalations following the murder of Alex Pretti—an intensive care unit nurse and AFGE Local 3669 member—who was shot in the back ten times in five seconds by ICE agents last week. In a press release, President of the National Nurses United (NNU) Mary Turner said that ICE “messed with the wrong profession” and to “never get between nurses and our patients… nurses are forever patient advocates, and that means we will fight to protect you at the bedside and we will fight to protect you in the streets—just as Alex was doing when he was executed in cold blood by [the] Border Patrol.” National outrage following Pretti’s death—in additon to other civilians such as Renee Good—at the hands of federal agents, has inspired a “national shutdown” today entailing “a nationwide day of no school, no work and no shopping.” Hundreds of organizations have endorsed this call to action, including the Harvard Graduate Students Union, Alphabet Workers Union, MIT Graduate Student Union, and the Graduate Labor Union at University of Minnesota.
Despite the evidence that tax breaks for data centers serve more as corporate subsidies than local job stimulators, tech giants are spending millions in advertising to make people believe otherwise. A report by the Ford School of Public Policy found that data centers do not create high-paying, long-term tech jobs in local communities. The initial building of the data centers can create many construction jobs, but they are short-lived—the majority of jobs that are actually created are typically low-wage, term-limited, contracted roles such as janitorial work, security, and maintenance. Americans are well aware that the construction of new data centers in their communities will likely result in higher energy bills, less water, and more air pollution, yet tech companies think these concerns can be solved, if only they hire the right “community affairs” publicist and spend enough on a media campaign.
Daily News & Commentary
Start your day with our roundup of the latest labor developments. See all
July 3
Unions seek a preliminary injunction to prevent USDA downsizing; the D.C. District Court issues a preliminary injunction against new student loan regulations; Matt Bruenig releases an analysis of Starbucks’ ongoing legal battle against Starbucks Workers United.
July 2
First Circuit denies federal worker unions’ mandamus petition; federal court denies preliminary injunction against new union reporting rule; House introduces the Securing Agriculture’s Workforce Act.
July 1
Trump nominates Keith Sonderling as Labor Secretary; DOL eliminates disparate-impact liability from Title VI regulations; OPM finalizes rule allowing suitability-based removal of federal employees for post-appointment conduct.
June 30
SCOTUS ends removal protections for agencies; staff at NYC cocktail bar vote to unionize.
June 29
In today’s News and Commentary, student-athletes file a class action suit challenging the NCAA’s new Age-Based Rule, a federal judge declines to issue a preliminary injunction against FEMA’s reduction in force but expedites proceedings, and Gavin Newsom opposes California’s proposed billionaire tax in favor of a federal approach. On Thursday, DeJuan Campbell, at basketball player […]
June 28
Philadelphia utility workers announce July 4 strike; national parks workers vote to unionize; Michigan considers “right to disconnect” bill.