Jon Weinberg is a student at Harvard Law School.
As Ryan highlighted in his post earlier this morning, the Seattle City Council unanimously passed historic legislation yesterday that gives independent contractor drivers the right to collectively bargain, including those for gig economy “transportation network companies” Uber and Lyft. The bill can be read in its entirety here.
Buzzfeed published a comprehensive summary on the legislation, the first of its kind passed by an American municipality, and its implications both in Seattle and nationally. Under the National Labor Relations Act, only drivers determined to be employees have collective bargaining rights. In Seattle, drivers would have similar rights despite their classification. Seattle Mayor Ed Murray will not sign the bill but also will not veto it, assuring its passage. The unionization process for Seattle drivers, if the bill survives legal challenges, will be as follows:
First, drivers will have to vote on whether they even want to seek representation as a group; if they do, they’ll have to select what group they want to be represented by. The city will approve groups that meet the necessary qualifications; they must be registered nonprofits experienced in negotiations between employers and contractors. Uber, Lyft and the other companies will then be required to share lists of people who work near full-time for them as drivers with the third-party group. The “near-full-time” classification will be based on a multi-part formula; to earn a vote, drivers have to work at least 80% of what full-time employment would be.
Professor Sachs noted that the Seattle City Council will almost certainly be challenged in court:
Benjamin Sachs, a Harvard Law School professor who has been following regulation of the gig economy closely, said Uber’s legal claims “will likely be federal labor preemption” (federal precedents that say contract workers can’t organize trumps local government) “and/or antitrust violations.” But, Sachs added: “There are very strong defenses to both legal attacks.”
The Teamsters supported the bill, and have set up an organization (the Apps-Based Drivers Association) that would aim to represent drivers should the law go into effect. Notably, the bill passed while Uber actively lobbies for state legislation mandating that drivers be classified as independent contractors. If other municipalities follow Seattle’s lead, Uber drivers may increasingly have a collective vehicle through which they can gain improved pay and benefits, no matter their worker classification.
Daily News & Commentary
Start your day with our roundup of the latest labor developments. See all
June 1
In today’s news and commentary, the Ninth Circuit upholds a preliminary injunction against the Trump Administration, a federal judge vacates parts of the EEOC’s pregnancy accommodation rules, and video game workers reach a tentative agreement with Microsoft. In a 2-1 decision issued on Friday, the Ninth Circuit upheld a preliminary injunction against the Trump Administration […]
May 30
Trump's tariffs temporarily reinstated after brief nationwide injunction; Louisiana Bill targets payroll deduction of union dues; Colorado Supreme Court to consider a self-defense exception to at-will employment
May 29
AFGE argues termination of collective bargaining agreement violates the union’s First Amendment rights; agricultural workers challenge card check laws; and the California Court of Appeal reaffirms San Francisco city workers’ right to strike.
May 28
A proposal to make the NLRB purely adjudicatory; a work stoppage among court-appointed lawyers in Massachusetts; portable benefits laws gain ground
May 27
a judge extends a pause on the Trump Administration’s mass-layoffs, the Fifth Circuit refuses to enforce an NLRB order, and the Texas Supreme court extends workplace discrimination suits to co-workers.
May 26
Federal court blocks mass firings at Department of Education; EPA deploys new AI tool; Chiquita fires thousands of workers.