Jon Weinberg is a student at Harvard Law School.
As Ryan highlighted in his post earlier this morning, the Seattle City Council unanimously passed historic legislation yesterday that gives independent contractor drivers the right to collectively bargain, including those for gig economy “transportation network companies” Uber and Lyft. The bill can be read in its entirety here.
Buzzfeed published a comprehensive summary on the legislation, the first of its kind passed by an American municipality, and its implications both in Seattle and nationally. Under the National Labor Relations Act, only drivers determined to be employees have collective bargaining rights. In Seattle, drivers would have similar rights despite their classification. Seattle Mayor Ed Murray will not sign the bill but also will not veto it, assuring its passage. The unionization process for Seattle drivers, if the bill survives legal challenges, will be as follows:
First, drivers will have to vote on whether they even want to seek representation as a group; if they do, they’ll have to select what group they want to be represented by. The city will approve groups that meet the necessary qualifications; they must be registered nonprofits experienced in negotiations between employers and contractors. Uber, Lyft and the other companies will then be required to share lists of people who work near full-time for them as drivers with the third-party group. The “near-full-time” classification will be based on a multi-part formula; to earn a vote, drivers have to work at least 80% of what full-time employment would be.
Professor Sachs noted that the Seattle City Council will almost certainly be challenged in court:
Benjamin Sachs, a Harvard Law School professor who has been following regulation of the gig economy closely, said Uber’s legal claims “will likely be federal labor preemption” (federal precedents that say contract workers can’t organize trumps local government) “and/or antitrust violations.” But, Sachs added: “There are very strong defenses to both legal attacks.”
The Teamsters supported the bill, and have set up an organization (the Apps-Based Drivers Association) that would aim to represent drivers should the law go into effect. Notably, the bill passed while Uber actively lobbies for state legislation mandating that drivers be classified as independent contractors. If other municipalities follow Seattle’s lead, Uber drivers may increasingly have a collective vehicle through which they can gain improved pay and benefits, no matter their worker classification.
Daily News & Commentary
Start your day with our roundup of the latest labor developments. See all
July 31
EEOC sued over trans rights enforcement; railroad union opposes railroad merger; suits against NLRB slow down.
July 30
In today’s news and commentary, the First Circuit will hear oral arguments on the Department of Homeland Security’s (DHS) revocation of parole grants for thousands of migrants; United Airlines’ flight attendants vote against a new labor contract; and the AFL-CIO files a complaint against a Trump Administrative Executive Order that strips the collective bargaining rights of the vast majority of federal workers.
July 29
The Trump administration released new guidelines for federal employers regarding religious expression in the workplace; the International Brotherhood of Boilermakers is suing former union president for repayment of mismanagement of union funds; Uber has criticized a new proposal requiring delivery workers to carry company-issued identification numbers.
July 28
Lower courts work out meaning of Muldrow; NLRB releases memos on recording and union salts.
July 27
In today’s news and commentary, Trump issues an EO on college sports, a second district court judge blocks the Department of Labor from winding down Job Corps, and Safeway workers in California reach a tentative agreement. On Thursday, President Trump announced an executive order titled “Saving College Sports,” which declared it common sense that “college […]
July 25
Philadelphia municipal workers ratify new contract; Chocolate companies escape liability in trafficking suit; Missouri Republicans kill paid sick leave