Divya Nimmagadda is a student at Harvard Law School.
In today’s labor news: SEIU president announces plans to step down and judges order Starbucks to reinstate unlawfully-dismissed, pro-union employees.
Mary Kay Henry has been president of the Service Employees International Union (SEIU) for fourteen years and was the first women elected to the position. The SEIU has a membership of almost two million workers across the healthcare, public sector and property services industries. Her leadership was instrumental in the “Fight for $15” campaign which sought to organize fast-food workers and advocate towards an industry-wide $15 minimum wage. This initiative has been credited with enacting wage changes in major cities, including Chicago and New York, and the discussion in some states, like California, has progressed beyond the original ideal to a $20 minimum.
Related to this theme of industry-centric changes, in 2019, Henry introduced the “Unions for All” campaign. This vision elevated the concept of sectoral organizing where labor activism, instead of organizing employer-by-employer, is focused on creating unions across industries, and sometimes across geographies. This approach, common in many European countries, is beginning to gain traction in the U.S. with the creation of some state-wide councils to set sector-wide health, safety and/or wage standards in the fast-food and healthcare industries. Many political candidates, including Joe Biden, Elizabeth Warren and Pete Buttegieg, incorporated aspects of “Unions for All” into their platforms.
The union will elect Henry’s successor through a delegate vote at the quadrennial convention in May.
An administrative law judge, Robert Ringler, found that Starbucks violated the NLRA by firing ten pro-union employees across several Buffalo locations – the company outright fired nine employees for their union-related activities and constructively dismissed another by refusing to accommodate her scheduling needs. This decision has been hailed as a “monumental victory,” by Starbucks Workers United.
Another judge, Mara Louise Anzalone, came to a similar conclusion about like conduct in two Colorado locations, finding that the dismissal of two pro-union employees constituted a violation of Section 8(a)(3) of the NLRA. Both judges ordered that Starbucks reinstate each of the employees, with backpay. These decisions will need to be adopted by the full NLRB, and Starbucks has commented that it intends to seek further legal review.
Daily News & Commentary
Start your day with our roundup of the latest labor developments. See all
April 24
NLRB seeks to compel Amazon to collectively bargain with San Francisco warehouse workers, DoorDash delivery workers and members of Los Deliveristas Unidos rally for pay transparency, and NLRB takes step to drop lawsuit against SpaceX over the firing of employees who criticized Elon Musk.
April 22
DOGE staffers eye NLRB for potential reorganization; attacks on federal workforce impact Trump-supporting areas; Utah governor acknowledges backlash to public-sector union ban
April 21
Bryan Johnson’s ULP saga before the NLRB continues; top law firms opt to appease the EEOC in its anti-DEI demands.
April 20
In today’s news and commentary, the Supreme Court rules for Cornell employees in an ERISA suit, the Sixth Circuit addresses whether the EFAA applies to a sexual harassment claim, and DOGE gains access to sensitive labor data on immigrants. On Thursday, the Supreme Court made it easier for employees to bring ERISA suits when their […]
April 18
Two major New York City unions endorse Cuomo for mayor; Committee on Education and the Workforce requests an investigation into a major healthcare union’s spending; Unions launch a national pro bono legal network for federal workers.
April 17
Utahns sign a petition supporting referendum to repeal law prohibiting public sector collective bargaining; the US District Court for the District of Columbia declines to dismiss claims filed by the AFL-CIO against several government agencies; and the DOGE faces reports that staffers of the agency accessed the NLRB’s sensitive case files.