
Greg Volynsky is a student at Harvard Law School.
In Today’s News & Commentary, the Minneapolis City Council approves ordinance mandating higher compensation for rideshare drivers, Bloomberg Law explains how major fast food corporations are complacent in franchisees’ labor law violations, the New York Times reports on a wave of assertive union leadership, and a crackdown on wage theft and working hours violations.
On Thursday, the Minneapolis City Council approved an ordinance mandating improved compensation and enhanced protections for rideshare drivers in the city. Despite opposition from Uber and Lyft, who threatened to cease operations in Minneapolis, the policy was passed with a 7-5 vote. This new regulation sets a pay rate for drivers at $1.40 per mile and 51 cents per minute, with provisions for yearly adjustments mirroring city’s minimum wage changes. Mayor Jacob Frey, while expressing support for increasing driver pay, has voiced concerns about the policy, echoing Lyft’s claims of exorbitant ride costs and possible service withdrawal. If the Mayor vetoes the bill, the City Council would need nine votes to override.
Rebecca Rainey of Bloomberg Law highlights that major fast food corporations often sidestep joint employer liability by omitting explicit labor standards from franchise agreements. This ambiguity leaves room for child labor violations, as franchisors decline to exercise their power over franchisees. Since the start of the Biden administration, the US Labor Department’s Wage and Hour Division has reported over 30 child labor breaches involving franchises such as McDonald’s, Sonic Drive-In, and Dunkin’ Donuts.
The New York Times sheds light on an emerging wave of assertive union leadership. Key leaders include Sean O’Brien of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, who labeled corporate executives as a “white-collar crime syndicate”, and Shawn Fain of the United Automobile Workers, who snubbed the usual handshake with the chief executive and is pushing for a significant 40% wage increase. This wave exemplifies growing frustrations among union members over out-of-touch leadership, stagnant wages, and unfavorable labor deals.
Recent crackdowns on wage theft have seen Boston Market being slapped with over $2.5 million in fines for allegedly withholding $607,000 from employees in New Jersey and NYC’s Envy Nails ordered to pay $300,000 due to allegations of employee misclassification and wage theft. Moreover, the NYC Department of Consumer and Worker Protection (DCWP) has reached a settlement with three major restaurant chains—Panda Express, Au Bon Pain, and 7-Eleven’s “Raise the Roost”—in a bid to uphold the city’s Fair Workweek Law. These establishments will collectively pay $4.5 million in restitution to 2,400 impacted workers and bear an additional $417,000 in civil penalties.
Daily News & Commentary
Start your day with our roundup of the latest labor developments. See all
October 8
In today’s news and commentary, the Trump administration threatens no back pay for furloughed federal workers; the Second Circuit denies a request from the NFL for an en banc review in the Brian Flores case; and Governor Gavin Newsom signs an agreement to create a pathway for unionization for Uber and Lyft drivers.
October 7
The Supreme Court kicks off its latest term, granting and declining certiorari in several labor-related cases.
October 6
EEOC regains quorum; Second Circuit issues opinion on DEI causing hostile work environment.
October 5
In today’s news and commentary, HELP committee schedules a vote on Trump’s NLRB nominees, the 5th Circuit rejects Amazon’s request for en banc review, and TV production workers win their first union contract. After a nomination hearing on Wednesday, the Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee scheduled a committee vote on President Trump’s NLRB nominees […]
October 3
California legislation empowers state labor board; ChatGPT used in hostile workplace case; more lawsuits challenge ICE arrests
October 2
AFGE and AFSCME sue in response to the threat of mass firings; another preliminary injunction preventing Trump from stripping some federal workers of collective bargaining rights; and challenges to state laws banning captive audience meetings.