
John Fry is a student at Harvard Law School.
In today’s news and commentary, the Supreme Court hears cases about 10(j) injunctions and forced arbitration; and workers increasingly strike before earning a first union contract.
The Supreme Court is hearing oral argument today in a case regarding what standard courts should apply to the NLRB’s requests for 10(j) injunctions. These injunctions allow the agency to seek immediate relief in time-sensitive cases, for example when union supporters are unlawfully fired shortly before a union election. Four circuit courts currently apply their typical multi-factor test for injunctions to 10(j) requests, while five other circuits focus on whether the likelihood of a labor law violation makes a 10(j) injunction “just and proper.” Data suggest that the two tests yield similar results in court. This case arises out of an injunction that the NLRB obtained against Starbucks after it fired a group of workers known as the “Memphis Seven” at a Tennessee store.
The Court also heard oral argument yesterday in Smith v. Spizzirri, which presents the question of whether courts should stay or dismiss employment lawsuits pending the outcome of mandatory arbitration. While 65% of low-wage workers are bound by forced arbitration clauses, which the Supreme Court has been eager to find enforceable, there is a circuit split regarding how courts should process cases bound for arbitration. In four circuits, courts may dismiss these cases in order to reduce strain on their dockets. Six other circuits instead require that these cases be put on hold. Employment law experts have argued that dismissal is actually better for workers, because it allows them to immediately appeal the enforceability of the arbitration agreements that bind them.
Recent data indicates that newly unionized workers are increasingly striking before they win their first union contract. Bloomberg Law reports that over one-third of strikes in 2022 and 2023 fit this description, more than double the previous rate. The uptick in pre-contract strikes may be related to the ever-more-lengthy delays that unions face in bargaining first contracts, which now average over 500 days.
Daily News & Commentary
Start your day with our roundup of the latest labor developments. See all
May 4
In today’s news and commentary, DOL pauses the 2024 gig worker rule, a coalition of unions, cities, and nonprofits sues to stop DOGE, and the Chicago Teachers Union reaches a remarkable deal. On May 1, the Department of Labor announced it would pause enforcement of the Biden Administration’s independent contractor classification rule. Under the January […]
May 2
Immigrant detainees win class certification; Missouri sick leave law in effect; OSHA unexpectedly continues Biden-Era Worker Heat Rule
May 1
SEIU 721 concludes a 48-hour unfair labor practice strike; NLRB Administrative Law Judge holds that Starbucks committed a series of unfair labor practices at a store in Philadelphia; AFSCME and UPTE members at the University of California are striking.
April 30
In today’s news and commentary, SEIU seeks union rights for rideshare drivers in California, New Jersey proposes applying the ABC Test, and Board officials push back on calls for layoffs. In California, Politico reports that an SEIU-backed bill that would allow rideshare drivers to join unions has passed out of committee, “clear[ing] its first hurdle.” […]
April 29
In today’s news and commentary, CFPB mass layoffs paused again, Mine Safety agency rejects union intervention, and postdoctoral researchers petition for union election. A temporary pause on mass firings at the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) has been restored. After a trial court initially blocked the administration from mass firings, the appeals court modified that […]
April 28
WA strike bill goes to governor; MLBPA discloses legal expenses; Ex-Twitter employees seek class certification against Musk.