
Anjali Katta is a student at Harvard Law School.
In today’s news and commentary, Aramark workers at Philly stadiums reach tentative agreement, Crystal Carey is poised to take general counsel at NLRB, President Trump’s nominees for key DOL positions, and the National Treasury Employees Union sues the Trump administration.
UNITE HERE Local 274, which represents thousands of food service workers in the Philadelphia region, announced that they reached a tentative agreement with Aramark for a new set of contracts with food service workers at three stadiums. The new 6-year contracts increase the wage floor to $20 dollars an hour for non-tipped workers, expand health care coverage and benefits, and increase the number of paid holidays. Aramark and UNITE HERE reached agreement after almost a year of negotiations which included a four-day strike last fall. Notably, the contracts will be in effect through the 2026 FIFA World Cup, which will feature games that take place at one of the three stadiums represented by the contracts.
President Trump nominated Crystal Carey to serve as the general counsel of the NLRB. Carey is currently a partner at the management-side law firm Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP. Carey’s nomination fits within President Trump’s push to staff the NLRB with pro-employer members. Carey has worked at the NLRB for over eight years and has been a vocal critic of recent decisions issued under the Biden-era NLRB. Some unions, including the Teamsters, have vocally opposed the nomination.
The Trump administration has made their nominations to fill key positions within the Department of Labor (DOL). Andrew Rogers, EEOC’s acting general counsel, was nominated to head the DOL’s Wage and Hour division. Jonathan Berry, a partner at Boyden Gray PLLC, was nominated for labor solicitor. Both Berry and Rogers previously worked under the first Trump administration. In addition, President Trump nominated David Castillo as the DOL’s chief financial officer and Anthony D’Esposito as the agency’s inspector general.
In response to President Trump’s lawsuit against the National Treasury Employees Union (NTEU), the NTEU has filed its own lawsuit against the Trump administration. As described by Justin, the Trump administration’s lawsuit seeks to void collective bargaining agreements by referencing an executive order directing agencies to end collective bargaining with federal workers and citing to national security concerns. The NTEU’s lawsuit argues that the executive order exceeds the President’s authority and violates the law. Specifically, lawsuit alleges that the executive order contradicts the Federal Labor Relations Act (FLRA), which affirmatively allows federal workers to form unions and collectively bargain with their employers. NTEU’s lawsuit marks an escalation in the struggle between federal workers, their representatives, and the administration.
Daily News & Commentary
Start your day with our roundup of the latest labor developments. See all
June 3
Federal judge blocks Trump's attack on TSA collective bargaining rights; NLRB argues that Grindr's Return-to-Office policy was union busting; International Trade Union Confederation report highlights global decline in workers' rights.
June 2
Proposed budgets for DOL and NLRB show cuts on the horizon; Oregon law requiring LPAs in cannabis dispensaries struck down.
June 1
In today’s news and commentary, the Ninth Circuit upholds a preliminary injunction against the Trump Administration, a federal judge vacates parts of the EEOC’s pregnancy accommodation rules, and video game workers reach a tentative agreement with Microsoft. In a 2-1 decision issued on Friday, the Ninth Circuit upheld a preliminary injunction against the Trump Administration […]
May 30
Trump's tariffs temporarily reinstated after brief nationwide injunction; Louisiana Bill targets payroll deduction of union dues; Colorado Supreme Court to consider a self-defense exception to at-will employment
May 29
AFGE argues termination of collective bargaining agreement violates the union’s First Amendment rights; agricultural workers challenge card check laws; and the California Court of Appeal reaffirms San Francisco city workers’ right to strike.
May 28
A proposal to make the NLRB purely adjudicatory; a work stoppage among court-appointed lawyers in Massachusetts; portable benefits laws gain ground