Liana Wang is a student at Harvard Law School.
In today’s news and commentary, a second consecutive weak jobs report, the Trump Administration refuses to arbitrate with federal workers, and a district court rules that mandatory detention under the Laken Riley Act violates due process.
On Friday, the Bureau of Labor Statistics released its August job report. Last month, the U.S. economy added around 22,000 jobs, following two weak months of job growth in June and July. Thus far, the country has added around 598,000 jobs this year, compared to 1.14 million jobs by the same time last year. The unemployment rate also rose to 4.3%, and over 25% of unemployed workers have been jobless for over 6 months, the highest level since June 2016. The numbers appear to reflect the impact of the administration’s tariffs, which have driven up prices, as well as mass layoffs from the federal government, the reverberating impact of cancelled federal grants and contracts, and the administration’s immigration crackdown. The poor report comes after President Trump fired the former head of BLS, Erika McEntarfer, after the July jobs report sharply revised down previous numbers. Although President Trump has attacked the Federal Reserve chair, Jerome Powell, in a push to lower interest rates, the Fed is also wary of feeding rising inflation.
Meanwhile, on the tails of another directive ending collective bargaining for additional agencies, Trump Administration officials have told workers that the government would quit arbitration in disputes that arose under the now-cancelled labor contracts. Arbitration typically allows both the employee and employer to resolve workplace disputes based on the decision of a neutral third party. And a 1977 Supreme Court decision, Nolde Bros. v. Bakery & Confectionary Workers Union Local 358, held that the parties’ obligation to arbitrate “may survive contract termination when the dispute is over an obligation arguably created by the expired agreement.” However, the government has cited its broad national security concerns as justification for not just dissolving the unions, but also discontinuing arbitration proceedings.
Lastly, a federal district court judge on Friday granted a habeas petition on the grounds that detention without a bond hearing under the Laken Riley Act violates due process. As Meredith covered for OnLabor earlier this year, the LRA mandates no-bond detention for individuals who are simply arrested for or charged with an offense, even if the accusation is false or if charges are never filed. In doing so, the LRA renders undocumented workers even more vulnerable to their employers; those who speak up against abusive employer practices like wage theft or unsafe working conditions may face retaliation via accusations of petty crimes. The district court’s decision appears to be the first order to address the constitutionality of mandatory detention under the LRA. Although the order does not invalidate the LRA, it opens up a pathway for detained immigrants to fight it.
Daily News & Commentary
Start your day with our roundup of the latest labor developments. See all
December 22
Worker-friendly legislation enacted in New York; UW Professor wins free speech case; Trucking company ordered to pay $23 million to Teamsters.
December 21
Argentine unions march against labor law reform; WNBA players vote to authorize a strike; and the NLRB prepares to clear its backlog.
December 19
Labor law professors file an amici curiae and the NLRB regains quorum.
December 18
New Jersey adopts disparate impact rules; Teamsters oppose railroad merger; court pauses more shutdown layoffs.
December 17
The TSA suspends a labor union representing 47,000 officers for a second time; the Trump administration seeks to recruit over 1,000 artificial intelligence experts to the federal workforce; and the New York Times reports on the tumultuous changes that U.S. labor relations has seen over the past year.
December 16
Second Circuit affirms dismissal of former collegiate athletes’ antitrust suit; UPS will invest $120 million in truck-unloading robots; Sharon Block argues there are reasons for optimism about labor’s future.