Irregular work schedules and the increased use of on-call scheduling are making workers sick, according to Teresa Tritch in the New York Times. Studies have found that workers with little advance notice of work schedules experienced greater stress, anxiety, fatigue, and family conflicts. The article noted that increasingly erratic scheduling has resulted from business practices that incent managers to have the leanest staffing possible in order to control labor costs. Tritch noted that these practices put the short-term profits of companies above the long-term health of the economy because such practices depress consumer spending. Tritch argued that just as it is illegal for employers to make workers sick with harmful substances, “[i]t also should be illegal to make them sick with irregular and on-call schedules.”
New York is taking steps to ensure that nail salon workers who win minimum-wage cases against employers can collect their judgments, according to the New York Times. Under the new rule proposed by Governor Andrew Cuomo, nail salons must secure wage bonds to ensure that they can pay back wages. Although seen as a step forward in an industry that has come under criticism for its wage practices, critics claimed that the move still required putting trust in nail salon owners who may already be suspected of breaking the law. The critics advocate allowing workers to secure liens on owners’ property until the wages are paid. Nevertheless, Kara Williams, an attorney representing workers in wage disputes, called the move “a huge leap forward in protecting workers.”
California has removed the word “alien” from its labor code, according to the San Francisco Chronicle. State Senator Tony Mendoza, who sponsored the bill, stated that the move sought to remove the term from the state’s laws because of its derogatory connotation. He said, “The word ‘alien,’ and any law prescribing an order for the issuance of employment to ‘aliens,’ have no place in the laws of our state and more importantly, should never be the basis for any employment hiring. (The law) deletes this outdated, discriminatory and unnecessary reference in state law.”
At NPR, Anya Kamenetz explored the changing meaning of the summer job for college students. In the early 1980s, a student working a minimum wage job needed to only wor 16 hours a week year-round, 9 hours a day for three months, or some combination of the two in order to pay for college. Rapidly soaring college costs combined with the glacial rate of the minimum wage’s increase, however, have made this practice impossible for today’s college students, who would have to work 35 hours a week all year long in order to pay for school fees–a virtually impossible and unhealthy lifestyle for a full-time student.
Daily News & Commentary
Start your day with our roundup of the latest labor developments. See all
September 17
A union argues the NLRB's quorum rule is unconstitutional; the California Building Trades back a state housing law; and Missouri proposes raising the bar for citizen ballot initiatives
September 16
In today’s news and commentary, the NLRB sues New York, a flight attendant sues United, and the Third Circuit considers the employment status of Uber drivers The NLRB sued New York to block a new law that would grant the state authority over private-sector labor disputes. As reported on recently by Finlay, the law, which […]
September 15
Unemployment claims rise; a federal court hands victory to government employees union; and employers fire workers over social media posts.
September 14
Workers at Boeing reject the company’s third contract proposal; NLRB Acting General Counsel William Cohen plans to sue New York over the state’s trigger bill; Air Canada flight attendants reject a tentative contract.
September 12
Zohran Mamdani calls on FIFA to end dynamic pricing for the World Cup; the San Francisco Office of Labor Standards Enforcement opens a probe into Scale AI’s labor practices; and union members organize immigration defense trainings.
September 11
California rideshare deal advances; Boeing reaches tentative agreement with union; FTC scrutinizes healthcare noncompetes.