Deanna Krokos is a student at Harvard Law School
On Saturday, several Democratic presidential candidates headed to Las Vegas for a forum hosted by the American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees. The candidates laid out their plans for the economy and labor law reform in front of an audience of AFSCME members.
The forum brought a focus to labor issues that were lacking is last week’s debates, as Jared wrote on Thursday. The nineteen Democrats spoke about their commitment to workers’ rights, possible picks to head the Department of Labor, and the health care policy split that has nearly dominated the primary.
The forum represents the political importance of the labor movement for Democratic presidential hopefuls. The Washington Post reports that many unions are holding back from early endorsements and the “boots on the ground” organizing energy they often provide. The forum’s location in Nevada brought these issues to the forefront. In addition to being the first early primary state in the west, the state has a strong union presence, especially among hotel and culinary workers. In June, nearly 20,000 of Nevada’s state employees won the right to collectively bargain, further signaling labor’s importance and strength in the battleground state.
Last week, home improvement giant Lowe’s revealed a plan to layoff thousands of workers in their retail stores across the U.S. The cuts are mainly targeted at workers who assembled products or provided maintenance and janitorial services. The Wall Street Journal reports that most workers are being offered a small amount of “transition pay,” typically two week’s salary. Many of these jobs will be “outsourced” to third-party contracting firms, where non-Lowe’s employees or independent contractors will be hired to perform those same tasks. This news comes after Lowe’s closed 47 stores last year in the U.S. and Canada.
This follows a decades-long trend of “fissuring” jobs in sectors like janitorial services, described by former DOL Wage and Hour Chief David Weil as “work in which the relationship between employer and employee has been fragmented, usually as part of a deliberate strategy to undermine wages and worker bargaining power.” In this book The Fissured Workplace, he warns that these fissured jobs are often characterized by “low wages, noncompliance with core workplace statutes, limited benefits, more contingent employment, greater risk exposure, and weakened bargaining leverage for workers.”
Daily News & Commentary
Start your day with our roundup of the latest labor developments. See all
September 12
Zohran Mamdani calls on FIFA to end dynamic pricing for the World Cup; the San Francisco Office of Labor Standards Enforcement opens a probe into Scale AI’s labor practices; and union members organize immigration defense trainings.
September 11
California rideshare deal advances; Boeing reaches tentative agreement with union; FTC scrutinizes healthcare noncompetes.
September 10
A federal judge denies a motion by the Trump Administration to dismiss a lawsuit led by the American Federation of Government Employees against President Trump for his mass layoffs of federal workers; the Supreme Court grants a stay on a federal district court order that originally barred ICE agents from questioning and detaining individuals based on their presence at a particular location, the type of work they do, their race or ethnicity, and their accent while speaking English or Spanish; and a hospital seeks to limit OSHA's ability to cite employers for failing to halt workplace violence without a specific regulation in place.
September 9
Ninth Circuit revives Trader Joe’s lawsuit against employee union; new bill aims to make striking workers eligible for benefits; university lecturer who praised Hitler gets another chance at First Amendment claims.
September 8
DC Circuit to rule on deference to NLRB, more vaccine exemption cases, Senate considers ban on forced arbitration for age discrimination claims.
September 7
Another weak jobs report, the Trump Administration's refusal to arbitrate with federal workers, and a district court judge's order on the constitutionality of the Laken-Riley Act.