Deanna Krokos is a student at Harvard Law School
Last week, Virginia became a “standout in the South” by enacting legislation to protect LGBTQ workers from discrimination in the workplace. The “Virginia Values Act” allows LGBTQ workers to sue for damages if they are mistreated or fired on the basis of their sexual orientation, and BloombergLaw reports that it also eliminates the state’s cap on damages that a worker can be awarded. While a minority of states have passed similar legislation, the bill is a significant step toward securing nationwide protections. This also comes as the nation awaits the Supreme Court’s ruling on whether the Civil Rights Act of 1964’s protections against sex discrimination in Title VII already encompasses those protections. Virginia’s law will go in to effect July 1st.
BloombergLaw reports that hundreds of meat workers in the U.S. have tested positive for COVID-19. Facilities in Colorado, Pennsylvania, and South Dakota have all reported outbreaks, leading to concerns about worker safety among personnel essential to maintaining food supply. These jobs are labor-intensive, and require close contact between workers throughout the plant. Some plants have suspended operations during the outbreak, but “most farms and food companies” are continuing to operate although a source told NPR that the risks and pressures have made “the decline in available workers… severe.”
The risks in the meat industry are extreme but not unique; throughout the country, workers are facing threats to their health and security to perform essential jobs This week, the FDA issued new guidance to employers throughout the food-service and grocery industries. This guidance includes many already-common practices of facial coverings, social distancing, and protocols for assessing worker health during every shift to prevent wider exposure.
But The Washington Post reports that the FDA’s power is limited. The FDA’s regulatory authority extends to food safety, not general working conditions, and they are not able to require establishments to limit the public capacity of workplaces or enforce any stringent rules. Many local governments have filled this gap, including Washington, D.C. Miami, FL and the state of Maryland, but some are looking to the Occupational Safety and Health Administration to step in. The bulk of OSHA’s response has been non-binding, non-enforceable “alerts” suggesting safety tips. The Hill published an opinion piece by Justice at Work’s Michal Felsen calling for emergency temporary regulations to protect frontline workers and fulfill the agency’s mission.
Daily News & Commentary
Start your day with our roundup of the latest labor developments. See all
July 1
Trump nominates Keith Sonderling as Labor Secretary; OPM finalizes rule allowing suitability-based removal of federal employees for post-appointment conduct.
June 30
SCOTUS ends removal protections for agencies; staff at NYC cocktail bar vote to unionize.
June 29
In today’s News and Commentary, student-athletes file a class action suit challenging the NCAA’s new Age-Based Rule, a federal judge declines to issue a preliminary injunction against FEMA’s reduction in force but expedites proceedings, and Gavin Newsom opposes California’s proposed billionaire tax in favor of a federal approach. On Thursday, DeJuan Campbell, at basketball player […]
June 28
Philadelphia utility workers announce July 4 strike; national parks workers vote to unionize; Michigan considers “right to disconnect” bill.
June 26
Mamdani issues workplace heat protections order; Fifth Circuit denies enforcement of NLRB order against Starbucks; AFGE unlikely to secure injunction against FEMA layoffs.
June 25
NLRB orders Amazon to bargain with workers; federal judge blocks ICE agents from making arrests in courthouses.