An op-ed in the New York Times reports that the value of women’s unpaid labor across the world last year was $10.9 trillion. This estimate comes from a recent report by Oxfam, which calculates how much women would have made had they been paid the minimum wage in their country of residence for time spent on routine shopping for necessary household goods, child care, tending to the elderly and other household or non-household members, and other unpaid activities related to household maintenance. The value of women’s unpaid labor, the report notes, is more than the combined revenue of the 50 largest Fortune 500 companies. In the United States, where women perform an average of four hours of unpaid work per day, the value of women’s unpaid labor last year was $1.5 trillion. Men in the United States only perform two and a half hours of unpaid work per day.
The Times also reports on the evolution of the labor market for doctoral students, and its current bleak state. In 1995, approximately half of people employed teaching college had tenure or were on track to get it. Today, most people teaching college are adjunct professors, part-time faculty, or both. Many of those people earn only a few thousand dollars per course, with no health insurance or retirement benefits. Twenty-five percent of part-time faculty receive some form of public assistance. This change has been driven by an increase in the number of Ph.D.s awarded and a decrease in the number of college students. This imbalance in supply and demand drives down wages for adjunct professors. Tenured professors, however, have likely benefitted—when adjunct professors are willing to work for less, universities can hire more of them to teach classes and free up time for tenured faculty to conduct research.
On Thursday, the Department of Labor announced a new rule requiring labor organizations with total annual receipts of $250,000 to file annual financial reports concerning their trusts. In its news release announcing the rule, the Department noted the recent convictions of UAW and Fiat Chrysler officials for embezzling union funds, and asserted that the embezzlement would have been caught sooner had the rule been in place.
Just hours after the Department of Labor announced its new rule, federal prosecutors announced embezzlement charges against former UAW president Gary Jones. Jones is accused of misusing over $1 million in union funds for meals, golf outings, cigars, clothing, and other personal purchases. In a news conference in Detroit, Matthew Schneider, the US Attorney for the Eastern District of Michigan and the lead prosecutor on the case, hinted at the possibility of a federal takeover of the UAW, saying that federal oversight could be a “good model here.”
Daily News & Commentary
Start your day with our roundup of the latest labor developments. See all
June 22
California lawmakers challenge Garmon preemption in the absence of an NLRB quorum and Utah organizers successfully secure a ballot referendum to overturn HB 267.
June 20
Three state bills challenge Garmon preemption; Wisconsin passes a bill establishing portable benefits for gig workers; and a sharp increase in workplace ICE raids contribute to a nationwide labor shortage.
June 19
Report finds retaliatory action by UAW President; Senators question Trump's EEOC pick; California considers new bill to address federal labor law failures.
June 18
Companies dispute NLRB regional directors' authority to make rulings while the Board lacks a quorum; the Department of Justice loses 4,500 employees to the Trump Administration's buyout offers; and a judge dismisses Columbia faculty's lawsuit over the institution's funding cuts.
June 17
NLRB finds a reporter's online criticism of the Washington Post was not protected activity under federal labor law; top union leaders leave the Democratic National Committee amid internal strife; Uber reaches a labor peace agreement with Chicago drivers.
June 16
California considers bill requiring human operators inside autonomous delivery vehicles; Eighth Circuit considers challenge to Minnesota misclassification law and whether "having a family to support" is a gendered comment.