Fred Messner is a student at Harvard Law School.
Over the weekend, a federal judge dismissed a lawsuit filed by over 100 employees of a Texas hospital who were seeking to challenge their employer’s COVID-19 vaccine requirement. The complaint alleged that the hospital system had unlawfully forced its employees to be “human ‘guinea pigs’ as a condition for continued employment.” In rejecting the suit, Judge Lynn N. Hughes of the Southern District of Texas not only held that the employee plaintiffs had no legal claim, but also rejected as “false” and “irrelevant” their factual allegations that the vaccines are experimental and dangerous. Notably, however, Judge Hughes resolved the case under Texas state employment law, so it is unlikely to serve as more than persuasive precedent in other jurisdictions.
At the federal level, employers are struggling to make sense of the EEOC’s May guidance on whether incentives can be offered to encourage workers to get vaccinated voluntarily. The Commission had attempted to clarify that employers are free to offer incentives so long as those incentives are not “so substantial as to be coercive,” but the contours of the “coercive” standard remain shrouded in doubt. As Bloomberg Law reported this morning, significant disagreement exists among employers, lawyers, and commentators over what sorts of incentives would exceed that limit. This is not the first time the EEOC has struggled to impose clear limits on employer incentives. In 2018, the Commission barred employers from offering “coercive” incentives for workers to participate in wellness programs, but its definition of the term was struck down in federal court.
In other Department of Labor news, the White House released a regulatory agenda on Friday that detailed DOL’s plans to “update and modernize” the regulations governing wage and hour standards for most federally funded work. Among the nascent regulations are proposals that would raise the minimum wage for federal contractors to $15 per hour as early as 2022, eliminate the subminimum tipped wage for them by 2024, and improve tracking of workplace injuries. Additionally, DOL indicated that it was considering proposals to “withdraw the obstacles to protecting and strengthening workers’ economic security and civil rights that the prior administration put in place.”
Finally, Motherboard by Vice released a “Guide to the Gig Economy” this morning with explainers on common concepts and buzzwords, many of which provide a rare window into the daily life of gig workers. For instance, the guide explains that “deadhead” refers to “the unpaid portion of gig work that comes after dropping off a person or item, but before arriving at the next pickup.” “Deactivation,” the article explains wryly, is “[a]n innuendo applied when workers are fired or terminated to prevent any association with the concept of employment.” As the gig work model continues to proliferate throughout the American economy, this nomenclature has already become part of many Americans’ daily vernacular, but viewing it all in one place is a healthy reminder of how much the economy and labor force have changed over the last decade.
Daily News & Commentary
Start your day with our roundup of the latest labor developments. See all
July 10
Brigham and Women’s Hospital locks out 4,000 nurses after one-day strike; appeal filed challenging agency-shop agreements.
July 9
The Second Circuit declines to vacate an arbitration award over a nursing union dispute; federal workers sue the Department of Defense for termination of union contracts; New York City announces settlement with companies for violating New York work laws.
July 8
DOL plans to make changes to the PERM immigration program; three-day hearing on proposed forced-labor tariffs is underway; Mamdani recovers $2.3M in corporate settlements.
July 7
Former EEOC Commissioner drops her wrongful termination lawsuit following the Supreme Court’s ruling on Presidential removal power; unions sue Department of Defense over cancellation of collective bargaining agreements.
July 6
NY home health worker class action settlement secures preliminary approval; the NLRB upholds order finding Amazon violated federal labor law.
July 3
Unions seek a preliminary injunction to prevent USDA downsizing; the D.C. District Court issues a preliminary injunction against new student loan regulations; Matt Bruenig releases an analysis of Starbucks’ ongoing legal battle against Starbucks Workers United.