
Rund Khayyat is a student at Harvard Law School.
Many American workers faced a Hobson’s choice during the pandemic: either return to unsafe workplaces, or refuse to work and lose wages and unemployment insurance (UI) eligibility. To address the dilemma, the Department of Labor directed states on Thursday to begin providing unemployment benefits to workers who refuse to return to work, or to accept a job offer, over concerns about workplace virus exposure.
The expanded eligibility is under the federal CARES Act, which provided Pandemic Unemployment Assistance (PUA) to self-employed individuals, independent contractors, and other workers that traditional state-managed UI programs don’t cover. Though regular UI is a creature of state law, the PUA falls under the authority of the Labor Department.
The new guidance extends PUA benefits to three categories of workers: those who lost traditional unemployment benefits because they refused to return to an unsafe job; those who faced layoffs or reduced hours due to the pandemic; and school employees at risk of losing stable pay or employment if their schools close because of the virus.
The first category applies to employees who refused to work at a site that “is not in compliance with local, state, or national health and safety standards directly related to COVID-19,” according to the guidance letter. “This includes, but is not limited to, those related to facial mask wearing, physical distancing measures, or the provision of personal protective equipment consistent with public health guidelines.” Those who apply would have to testify that they faced unsafe conditions at work.
Also Thursday, the Senate parliamentarian ruled that the $15 minimum wage provision, which Democrats attached to the $1.9 trillion Covid-relief bill, was ineligible for passage through the budget reconciliation process. As we previously reported, Democrats hoped to rely on reconciliation, a mechanism that only requires a simple majority, to pass the wage hike because they wouldn’t have the 60 votes needed to otherwise pass the provision through the Senate. Budget reconciliation, however, only applies to “taxing and spending” provisions, and the parliamentarian ruled that the $15 hike fails to meet that requirement.
The ruling deals a significant blow to the fight for $15. Progressives have called on party leaders to set the decision aside and proceed anyways, which is technically within Vice President Harris’ authority, but the White House is unlikely to take this path and risk isolating Republicans.
Alternatively, Democrats could garner 50 votes to overrule the parliamentarian’s decision. But they are unlikely to have the necessary support — West Virginia Senator Manchin, a moderate Democrat, had already indicated he would not supply the key vote. Even if Democrats did restore the wage measure to the reconciliation process, they would still need to convince Manchin, or alternatively to recruit a Republican, to reach 50 votes to pass reconciliation.
Alternatively, Senate Budget Committee Chairman Bernie Sanders has pledged to seek an amendment that could make the wage increase a more explicitly fiscal measure, which could meet reconciliation requirements, and could potentially garner more support.
Senate Finance Committee Chairman Ron Wyden of Oregon proposed another alternative, stating that he’s “looking at a tax penalty for mega-corporations that refuse to pay a living wage.”
Daily News & Commentary
Start your day with our roundup of the latest labor developments. See all
July 9
In Today’s News and Commentary, the Supreme Court green-lights mass firings of federal workers, the Agricultural Secretary suggests Medicaid recipients can replace deported farm workers, and DHS ends Temporary Protected Status for Hondurans and Nicaraguans. In an 8-1 emergency docket decision released yesterday afternoon, the Supreme Court lifted an injunction by U.S. District Judge Susan […]
July 8
In today’s news and commentary, Apple wins at the Fifth Circuit against the NLRB, Florida enacts a noncompete-friendly law, and complications with the No Tax on Tips in the Big Beautiful Bill. Apple won an appeal overturning a National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) decision that the company violated labor law by coercively questioning an employee […]
July 7
LA economy deals with fallout from ICE raids; a new appeal challenges the NCAA antitrust settlement; and the EPA places dissenting employees on leave.
July 6
Municipal workers in Philadelphia continue to strike; Zohran Mamdani collects union endorsements; UFCW grocery workers in California and Colorado reach tentative agreements.
July 4
The DOL scraps a Biden-era proposed rule to end subminimum wages for disabled workers; millions will lose access to Medicaid and SNAP due to new proof of work requirements; and states step up in the noncompete policy space.
July 3
California compromises with unions on housing; 11th Circuit rules against transgender teacher; Harvard removes hundreds from grad student union.