Mackenzie Bouverat is a student at Harvard Law School.
“Normalcy is returning to Texas.” This bold anachronism was uttered today, in a small business in Central Texas, by the governor of the state. In his state of the state address, Greg Abbott announced a series of emergency authorizations to the Texas legislature, including “election integrity,” changes to bail bonds, improved broadband access, discouraging cities from “defunding the police,” and the immunization of Texas businesses from liability in civil lawsuits related to workers’ exposure to coronavirus. Per the Texas Constitution, lawmakers may not pass legislation during the first 60 days of a regular session unless declared an emergency prioritized by the governor. The new legislative session began Jan. 12.
As with the other elements of Abbott’s agenda (with the sole exception of broadband access), civil immunity for businesses who expose their employees to coronavirus have featured as Republican agenda priorities throughout and pandemic. Indeed, last August, Republican Attorneys General penned a letter to Senate leaders in support of the “Safe to Work Act,” introduced by Senate Republicans in late July. The Act proposes preemptive federal limitations on coronavirus-related tort suits, and permits all lawsuits related to coronavirus-related employer tort liability to federal courts to be filed in or removed to federal courts.
Nearly a dozen states have enacted legislation limiting COVID-19-related civil liability, although the businesses to which the liability immunity applies varies considerably between them. Those states include Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Utah, Wyoming, and Georgia. Even in the states who have not passed a quasi-wholesale bill granting corporate immunity for the employers of exposed workers, one recurring theme is the protection from civil liability for employers engaged in coronavirus-related commercial activity: healthcare providers, manufacturers and suppliers of personal protective equipment (PPE) or certain other supplies are immunized from suit in Massachusetts, Kentucky, Alaska, Ohio, New York, New Jersey and Wisconsin.
Joe Biden has been the President of the United States for 13 days. Despite his myriad campaign–trail promises to deliver a $2,000 — now $1,400 — dollar stimulus check into the hands of Americans on the election of a democratic majority in the Senate, he remains in closed-door “negotiations“ with prominent GOP senators on the question of coronavirus aid. The Republican counter-proposal to Biden’s ‘ambitious’ aid agenda scales back campaign promises considerably. It offers $160 billion for coronavirus testing, vaccine distribution and development, as well as the personal protective equipment production; $20 billion for the reopening of schools; small business relief; and individual aid. It also omits the federal minimum wage increase and abrogates direct aid to cities and states. It proposes $1,000 instead of $1,400 in direct payments limits them to individuals earning less than $50,000. CNN estimates that the means-tested relief regime proposed by GOP negotiators would disqualify 29,000 Americans eligible under Joe Biden’s proposed relief plans. It would also reduce federal employment benefits, setting weekly payments at $300 through June instead of $400 through September.
Daily News & Commentary
Start your day with our roundup of the latest labor developments. See all
June 3
Federal judge blocks Trump's attack on TSA collective bargaining rights; NLRB argues that Grindr's Return-to-Office policy was union busting; International Trade Union Confederation report highlights global decline in workers' rights.
June 2
Proposed budgets for DOL and NLRB show cuts on the horizon; Oregon law requiring LPAs in cannabis dispensaries struck down.
June 1
In today’s news and commentary, the Ninth Circuit upholds a preliminary injunction against the Trump Administration, a federal judge vacates parts of the EEOC’s pregnancy accommodation rules, and video game workers reach a tentative agreement with Microsoft. In a 2-1 decision issued on Friday, the Ninth Circuit upheld a preliminary injunction against the Trump Administration […]
May 30
Trump's tariffs temporarily reinstated after brief nationwide injunction; Louisiana Bill targets payroll deduction of union dues; Colorado Supreme Court to consider a self-defense exception to at-will employment
May 29
AFGE argues termination of collective bargaining agreement violates the union’s First Amendment rights; agricultural workers challenge card check laws; and the California Court of Appeal reaffirms San Francisco city workers’ right to strike.
May 28
A proposal to make the NLRB purely adjudicatory; a work stoppage among court-appointed lawyers in Massachusetts; portable benefits laws gain ground