Mackenzie Bouverat is a student at Harvard Law School.
“Normalcy is returning to Texas.” This bold anachronism was uttered today, in a small business in Central Texas, by the governor of the state. In his state of the state address, Greg Abbott announced a series of emergency authorizations to the Texas legislature, including “election integrity,” changes to bail bonds, improved broadband access, discouraging cities from “defunding the police,” and the immunization of Texas businesses from liability in civil lawsuits related to workers’ exposure to coronavirus. Per the Texas Constitution, lawmakers may not pass legislation during the first 60 days of a regular session unless declared an emergency prioritized by the governor. The new legislative session began Jan. 12.
As with the other elements of Abbott’s agenda (with the sole exception of broadband access), civil immunity for businesses who expose their employees to coronavirus have featured as Republican agenda priorities throughout and pandemic. Indeed, last August, Republican Attorneys General penned a letter to Senate leaders in support of the “Safe to Work Act,” introduced by Senate Republicans in late July. The Act proposes preemptive federal limitations on coronavirus-related tort suits, and permits all lawsuits related to coronavirus-related employer tort liability to federal courts to be filed in or removed to federal courts.
Nearly a dozen states have enacted legislation limiting COVID-19-related civil liability, although the businesses to which the liability immunity applies varies considerably between them. Those states include Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Utah, Wyoming, and Georgia. Even in the states who have not passed a quasi-wholesale bill granting corporate immunity for the employers of exposed workers, one recurring theme is the protection from civil liability for employers engaged in coronavirus-related commercial activity: healthcare providers, manufacturers and suppliers of personal protective equipment (PPE) or certain other supplies are immunized from suit in Massachusetts, Kentucky, Alaska, Ohio, New York, New Jersey and Wisconsin.
Joe Biden has been the President of the United States for 13 days. Despite his myriad campaign–trail promises to deliver a $2,000 — now $1,400 — dollar stimulus check into the hands of Americans on the election of a democratic majority in the Senate, he remains in closed-door “negotiations“ with prominent GOP senators on the question of coronavirus aid. The Republican counter-proposal to Biden’s ‘ambitious’ aid agenda scales back campaign promises considerably. It offers $160 billion for coronavirus testing, vaccine distribution and development, as well as the personal protective equipment production; $20 billion for the reopening of schools; small business relief; and individual aid. It also omits the federal minimum wage increase and abrogates direct aid to cities and states. It proposes $1,000 instead of $1,400 in direct payments limits them to individuals earning less than $50,000. CNN estimates that the means-tested relief regime proposed by GOP negotiators would disqualify 29,000 Americans eligible under Joe Biden’s proposed relief plans. It would also reduce federal employment benefits, setting weekly payments at $300 through June instead of $400 through September.
Daily News & Commentary
Start your day with our roundup of the latest labor developments. See all
August 1
The Michigan Supreme Court grants heightened judicial scrutiny over employment contracts that shorten the limitations period for filing civil rights claims; the California Labor Commission gains new enforcement power over tip theft; and a new Florida law further empowers employers issuing noncompete agreements.
July 31
EEOC sued over trans rights enforcement; railroad union opposes railroad merger; suits against NLRB slow down.
July 30
In today’s news and commentary, the First Circuit will hear oral arguments on the Department of Homeland Security’s (DHS) revocation of parole grants for thousands of migrants; United Airlines’ flight attendants vote against a new labor contract; and the AFL-CIO files a complaint against a Trump Administrative Executive Order that strips the collective bargaining rights of the vast majority of federal workers.
July 29
The Trump administration released new guidelines for federal employers regarding religious expression in the workplace; the International Brotherhood of Boilermakers is suing former union president for repayment of mismanagement of union funds; Uber has criticized a new proposal requiring delivery workers to carry company-issued identification numbers.
July 28
Lower courts work out meaning of Muldrow; NLRB releases memos on recording and union salts.
July 27
In today’s news and commentary, Trump issues an EO on college sports, a second district court judge blocks the Department of Labor from winding down Job Corps, and Safeway workers in California reach a tentative agreement. On Thursday, President Trump announced an executive order titled “Saving College Sports,” which declared it common sense that “college […]