Mackenzie Bouverat is a student at Harvard Law School.
As the number of confirmed cases of coronavirus in the United States surpasses five million, over a million Americans filed claims for unemployment insurance for the twentieth consecutive week. One in ten Americans report being unable to find work. Forty million are at risk of being evicted. Residential eviction backlogs are now being put into effect. Federal and state lawmakers continue to squabble over the next relief package. And second stimulus checks are conspicuously absent from Trump’s executive orders.
Machinists Local S6 is poised to end a month-long strike after reaching a tentative contract with Bath Iron Works. A subsidiary of General Dynamics, Bath Iron Works primarily builds various kinds of military vessels for the U.S. Navy. Zach has already detailed the reasons for which employees decided to strike: the company’s use of subcontractors and its revocation of employee benefits. The tentative contract preserves the existing subcontracting procedures, raises wages 3 percent over the three years of the contract, and improves healthcare coverage. The shipbuilder’s 4,500 employees will vote on the contract online and via telephone from Aug. 21-23.
Sixteen Republican Senators signed a letter calling on congressional leaders to devote an additional $25 billion to an airline support program in the CARES Act. The “payroll support program,” which was first approved in March, gave $31 billion in Federal aid to various airlines in exchange for their promise to refrain from laying off 76,000 airline industry employees. The program also banned stock buybacks and stock dividends. Securing the program has long been a priority for labor unions representing aviation industry workers.
On Saturday, Epic Systems Inc. reneged on its plan to reopen its Verona, Wisconsin campus after considerable backlash from local Public Health and from its own employees. The engineering and fabrication firm informed employees by email that they would no longer be required to return to work as Epic awaits further guidance from Public Health Madison and Dane County. The decision comes after the Department wrote to Epic detailing its concerns about noncompliance with the state’s return to work plan; the Department requested that Epic explain why it was necessary to contravene the Department’s mandate for businesses to “facilitate remote work and other measures that limit the number of individuals present at an office, facility or store” to the greatest extent possible. ToneMadison reported that groups of Epic employees were so outraged by the reopening plan that they had taken the first steps toward unionization; according to the publication, Epic employee met with International Association of Sheet Metal, Air, Rail and Transportation Workers (SMART) Local 565 organizers.
Daily News & Commentary
Start your day with our roundup of the latest labor developments. See all
June 22
California lawmakers challenge Garmon preemption in the absence of an NLRB quorum and Utah organizers successfully secure a ballot referendum to overturn HB 267.
June 20
Three state bills challenge Garmon preemption; Wisconsin passes a bill establishing portable benefits for gig workers; and a sharp increase in workplace ICE raids contribute to a nationwide labor shortage.
June 19
Report finds retaliatory action by UAW President; Senators question Trump's EEOC pick; California considers new bill to address federal labor law failures.
June 18
Companies dispute NLRB regional directors' authority to make rulings while the Board lacks a quorum; the Department of Justice loses 4,500 employees to the Trump Administration's buyout offers; and a judge dismisses Columbia faculty's lawsuit over the institution's funding cuts.
June 17
NLRB finds a reporter's online criticism of the Washington Post was not protected activity under federal labor law; top union leaders leave the Democratic National Committee amid internal strife; Uber reaches a labor peace agreement with Chicago drivers.
June 16
California considers bill requiring human operators inside autonomous delivery vehicles; Eighth Circuit considers challenge to Minnesota misclassification law and whether "having a family to support" is a gendered comment.