
Tala Doumani is a student at Harvard Law School.
California’s Fair Employment and Housing Council (FEHC) recently drafted a bill to ensure artificial intelligence (AI) and other related technologies used by employers in recruiting, hiring, and other employment decisions comply with anti-discrimination laws. In a working draft released to the public, the bill states that “the use of and reliance upon automated-decision systems that limit or screen out…applicants based on protected characteristic(s) set forth in this Act may constitute unlawful disparate treatment or disparate impact.” California’s concern about the increased role of AI and other related technologies have on employment decisions, combined with their general lack of regulation, has been shared by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). In October 2021, the EEOC launched an initiative on artificial intelligence and algorithmic fairness, stating that it “is keenly aware that these tools may mask and perpetuate bias or create new discriminatory barriers to jobs. We must work to ensure that these new technologies do not become a high-tech pathway to discrimination.”
If passed, the bill could expose employers to new liability for using these types of technologies in employer-related decision-making if non-compliant with anti-discrimination laws. The draft bill is currently in its pre-rule-making phased and the FEHC is accepting public comment on the matter at [email protected].
Daily News & Commentary
Start your day with our roundup of the latest labor developments. See all
April 29
In today’s news and commentary, CFPB mass layoffs paused again, Mine Safety agency rejects union intervention, and postdoctoral researchers petition for union election. A temporary pause on mass firings at the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) has been restored. After a trial court initially blocked the administration from mass firings, the appeals court modified that […]
April 28
WA strike bill goes to governor; MLBPA discloses legal expenses; Ex-Twitter employees seek class certification against Musk.
April 27
Judge thwarts Trump's attempt to strip federal workers' labor rights; AFGE to cut over half of its staff; Harvard unions rally amid attacks.
April 24
NLRB seeks to compel Amazon to collectively bargain with San Francisco warehouse workers, DoorDash delivery workers and members of Los Deliveristas Unidos rally for pay transparency, and NLRB takes step to drop lawsuit against SpaceX over the firing of employees who criticized Elon Musk.
April 22
DOGE staffers eye NLRB for potential reorganization; attacks on federal workforce impact Trump-supporting areas; Utah governor acknowledges backlash to public-sector union ban
April 21
Bryan Johnson’s ULP saga before the NLRB continues; top law firms opt to appease the EEOC in its anti-DEI demands.