Tala Doumani is a student at Harvard Law School.
California’s Fair Employment and Housing Council (FEHC) recently drafted a bill to ensure artificial intelligence (AI) and other related technologies used by employers in recruiting, hiring, and other employment decisions comply with anti-discrimination laws. In a working draft released to the public, the bill states that “the use of and reliance upon automated-decision systems that limit or screen out…applicants based on protected characteristic(s) set forth in this Act may constitute unlawful disparate treatment or disparate impact.” California’s concern about the increased role of AI and other related technologies have on employment decisions, combined with their general lack of regulation, has been shared by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). In October 2021, the EEOC launched an initiative on artificial intelligence and algorithmic fairness, stating that it “is keenly aware that these tools may mask and perpetuate bias or create new discriminatory barriers to jobs. We must work to ensure that these new technologies do not become a high-tech pathway to discrimination.”
If passed, the bill could expose employers to new liability for using these types of technologies in employer-related decision-making if non-compliant with anti-discrimination laws. The draft bill is currently in its pre-rule-making phased and the FEHC is accepting public comment on the matter at [email protected].
Daily News & Commentary
Start your day with our roundup of the latest labor developments. See all
February 10
San Francisco teachers walk out; NLRB reverses course on SpaceX; NYC nurses secure tentative agreements.
February 9
FTC argues DEI is anticompetitive collusion, Supreme Court may decide scope of exception to forced arbitration, NJ pauses ABC test rule.
February 8
The Second Circuit rejects a constitutional challenge to the NLRB, pharmacy and lab technicians join a California healthcare strike, and the EEOC defends a single better-paid worker standard in Equal Pay Act suits.
February 6
The California Supreme Court rules on an arbitration agreement, Trump administration announces new rule on civil service protections, and states modify affirmative action requirements
February 5
Minnesota schools and teachers sue to limit ICE presence near schools; labor leaders call on Newsom to protect workers from AI; UAW and Volkswagen reach a tentative agreement.
February 4
Lawsuit challenges Trump Gold Card; insurance coverage of fertility services; moratorium on layoffs for federal workers extended