Tala Doumani is a student at Harvard Law School.
California’s Fair Employment and Housing Council (FEHC) recently drafted a bill to ensure artificial intelligence (AI) and other related technologies used by employers in recruiting, hiring, and other employment decisions comply with anti-discrimination laws. In a working draft released to the public, the bill states that “the use of and reliance upon automated-decision systems that limit or screen out…applicants based on protected characteristic(s) set forth in this Act may constitute unlawful disparate treatment or disparate impact.” California’s concern about the increased role of AI and other related technologies have on employment decisions, combined with their general lack of regulation, has been shared by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). In October 2021, the EEOC launched an initiative on artificial intelligence and algorithmic fairness, stating that it “is keenly aware that these tools may mask and perpetuate bias or create new discriminatory barriers to jobs. We must work to ensure that these new technologies do not become a high-tech pathway to discrimination.”
If passed, the bill could expose employers to new liability for using these types of technologies in employer-related decision-making if non-compliant with anti-discrimination laws. The draft bill is currently in its pre-rule-making phased and the FEHC is accepting public comment on the matter at [email protected].
Daily News & Commentary
Start your day with our roundup of the latest labor developments. See all
March 26
Supreme Court hears oral argument in an FAA case; NLRB rules that Cemex does not impose an enforceable deadline for requesting an election; DOL proposes raising wage standards for H-1B workers.
March 25
UPS rescinded its driver buyout program; California court dismissed a whistleblower retaliation suit against Meta; EEOC announced $15 million settlement to resolve vaccine-related religious discrimination case.
March 24
The WNBPA unanimously votes to ratify the league’s new CBA; NYU professors begin striking; and a district court judge denies the government’s motion to dismiss a case challenging the Trump administration’s mass revocation of international student visas.
March 23
MSPB finds immigration judges removal protections unconstitutional, ICE deployed to airports.
March 22
Resurgence in salting among young activists; Michigan nurses strike; states experiment with policies supporting workers experiencing menopause.
March 20
Appeal to 9th Cir. over law allowing suit for impersonating union reps; Mass. judge denies motion to arbitrate drivers' claims; furloughed workers return to factory building MBTA trains.