Anita Alem is a student at Harvard Law School.
In today’s news and commentary: independent union Liga Sindical Obrera Mexicana wins against an employer-backed union in a critical vote near the United States-Mexico border; workers at Starbucks, Amazon and Trader Joe’s raise concerns over negotiating their first contracts with union-busting employers; and lawsuits allege Lyft uses worker misclassification to avoid sexual and physical assault liability.
On Wednesday, auto parts workers in Piedras Negras, Mexico, along the U.S. border, voted to join an independent auto union over the Confederation of Mexican Workers, a longstanding union that has been accused of being too company-friendly, in part because it is funded by the company. Liga Sindical Obrera Mexicana, the independent union, won 186 to 101, in an election that could signal a bright future for independent unions facing more corporate, employer-backed, and established unions.The workers produce parts for a Michigan-based manufacturing company that supplies carmakers such as Nissan and Tesla. Workers have expressed grievances regarding bonus hours, health and safety at the plant, and retaliation against workers who are in favor of the independent union.
The Guardian reported Thursday that from baristas at Starbucks to grocery retail workers at Trader Joes, workers are concerned that the new wave of unionizing may be stymied by union-busting employers who refuse to negotiate in good faith. While more than 200 Starbucks stores have unionized, Starbucks has not yet agreed to any contract terms and may try to have each individual store negotiate a contract, which could significantly delay negotiations. Amazon, too, has asked the NLRB to overturn the union election in what the union says is simply an attempt to delay contract negotiations. A lead organizer at Apple’s first unionized store, however, has said he is optimistic given Apple has been responsive to negotiations thus far.
Lyft drivers filed 18 new lawsuits and arbitrations across the country earlier this week, alleging that Lyft purposely misclassified employees as contractors to avoid having to provide legal workplace protections to its drivers, including to avoid liability for sexual and physical assaults perpetrated by customers against the platform’s drivers. Lyft itself has reported more than 4,000 claims of sexual assault from 2017 to 2019. The lawsuits come on the heels of a $8 million settlement with Uber for worker misclassification in California.
Daily News & Commentary
Start your day with our roundup of the latest labor developments. See all
September 17
A union argues the NLRB's quorum rule is unconstitutional; the California Building Trades back a state housing law; and Missouri proposes raising the bar for citizen ballot initiatives
September 16
In today’s news and commentary, the NLRB sues New York, a flight attendant sues United, and the Third Circuit considers the employment status of Uber drivers The NLRB sued New York to block a new law that would grant the state authority over private-sector labor disputes. As reported on recently by Finlay, the law, which […]
September 15
Unemployment claims rise; a federal court hands victory to government employees union; and employers fire workers over social media posts.
September 14
Workers at Boeing reject the company’s third contract proposal; NLRB Acting General Counsel William Cohen plans to sue New York over the state’s trigger bill; Air Canada flight attendants reject a tentative contract.
September 12
Zohran Mamdani calls on FIFA to end dynamic pricing for the World Cup; the San Francisco Office of Labor Standards Enforcement opens a probe into Scale AI’s labor practices; and union members organize immigration defense trainings.
September 11
California rideshare deal advances; Boeing reaches tentative agreement with union; FTC scrutinizes healthcare noncompetes.