News outlets around the country today continued to weigh in on Tuesday’s decision in Vergara v. California. In the Los Angeles Times, Jack Schneider argues that instead of making it easier to fire ineffective teachers, “we should be channeling our energies into building teacher capacity” by promoting professional development. Meanwhile, Jesse Rothstein, a Berkeley professor of public policy and economics who provided expert testimony for the defense in Vergara, argues in the New York Times that “eliminating tenure will do little to address the real barriers to effective teaching in impoverished schools, and may even make them worse.” The New York Times Editorial Board, on the other hand, writes approvingly of the decision. The Washington Post reports that the ruling has divided democrats, “revealing fissures in the once-solid alliance between labor unions and the Democratic Party.”
In the wake of the Seattle City Council’s unanimous decision to gradually raise the city’s minimum wage to $15 per hour, the International Franchise Association has filed a lawsuit in federal court challenging the proposed increase, according to the Associated Press. The Seattle law requires large businesses to begin paying the higher wage more quickly than small businesses. The suit claims that the ordinance “unfairly and irrationally discriminates” against small and independently owned franchises by treating them as large businesses if the national franchise network to which they belong collectively employs more than 500 people. The complaint alleges that this system runs afoul of both the Dormant Commerce Clause and the Equal Protection Clause, as well as “numerous other constitutional provisions, statutes, and legal doctrines.”
The Philadelphia Inquirer reports that a labor dispute between the Southeastern Pennsylvania Transit Authority (SEPTA) and its workers appears to be heading towards a strike after SEPTA moved unilaterally to give workers raises that management had proposed. The unions representing the workers called the proposed raises unacceptable; they have insisted that the workers should also receive a retroactive wage increase and an increase in pension benefits.
Observing that Virginia Congressman “Eric Cantor’s defeat has resulted in great speculation about the future of immigration politics,” the New York Times provides “a brief overview of where the public stands on immigration.” According to polls, a majority of Americans support giving illegal immigrants a chance to remain in the country.
Daily News & Commentary
Start your day with our roundup of the latest labor developments. See all
July 1
In today’s news and commentary, the Department of Labor proposes to roll back minimum wage and overtime protections for home care workers, a federal judge dismissed a lawsuit by public defenders over a union’s Gaza statements, and Philadelphia’s largest municipal union is on strike for first time in nearly 40 years. On Monday, the U.S. […]
June 30
Antidiscrimination scholars question McDonnell Douglas, George Washington University Hospital bargained in bad faith, and NY regulators defend LPA dispensary law.
June 29
In today’s news and commentary, Trump v. CASA restricts nationwide injunctions, a preliminary injunction continues to stop DOL from shutting down Job Corps, and the minimum wage is set to rise in multiple cities and states. On Friday, the Supreme Court held in Trump v. CASA that universal injunctions “likely exceed the equitable authority that […]
June 27
Labor's role in Zohran Mamdani's victory; DHS funding amendment aims to expand guest worker programs; COSELL submission deadline rapidly approaching
June 26
A district judge issues a preliminary injunction blocking agencies from implementing Trump’s executive order eliminating collective bargaining for federal workers; workers organize for the reinstatement of two doctors who were put on administrative leave after union activity; and Lamont vetoes unemployment benefits for striking workers.
June 25
Some circuits show less deference to NLRB; 3d Cir. affirms return to broader concerted activity definition; changes to federal workforce excluded from One Big Beautiful Bill.