Reuters on Harris v. Quinn Argument

Published January 21st, 2014 -  - 01.21.141


Amanda Becker at Reuters has a careful and good review of today’s argument in Harris v. Quinn.  She concludes:

The U.S. Supreme Court seemed unlikely on Tuesday to embrace a sweeping argument advanced by a group of Illinois state employees that paying mandatory union dues violates their free-speech rights.

Backed by the anti-union National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation, the employees, who care for the disabled, have asked the court to upend a decades-old practice that lets public-sector unions collect money from workers who do not want union representation, so long as the money is not spent on political activities.

Justices on the high court expressed reluctance to reconsider its 1977 ruling in Abood v. Detroit Board of Education. That ruling said unions could collect such compulsory dues under collective bargaining agreements.

The piece is worth a read.

61 views
bookmark icon