Gilbert Placeres is a student at Harvard Law School.
In today’s News & Commentary, Noam Scheiber explains the turnaround in Starbucks-Starbucks Workers United negotiations, a small-scale win in Texas against the new overtime rule, and California reforms its Private Attorneys General Act.
In the New York Times, Noam Scheiber writes about the turnaround in negotiations between Starbucks and Starbucks Workers United. After years of uncompromising resistance to the union campaign by the company, the two now seem on track to achieve a contract. Scheiber attributes the turnaround to four factors: (1) momentum from continued unionization election wins, including over 100 in 2023; (2) a new, more union-friendly CEO; (3) external pressure on the firm from socially-minded investors (over its labor practices) and consumers (over its perceived support of the Israeli military campaign in Gaza); and (4) frequent complaints filed against the company from the National Labor Relations Board.
A Texas federal judge has granted a preliminary injunction against the Department of Labor’s new overtime rule, but only insofar as it applies to the state of Texas as an employer. The new rule quite substantially increases the threshold of what workers are automatically eligible for overtime from $35,568 to $58,656. The state argued the new rule would lead to fewer jobs for state employees and cuts in state services. The same judge, Sean Jordan of the Eastern District of Texas, is also presiding over a separate challenge to the rule by business groups.
Lastly, California has passed major changes to its Private Attorneys General Act, which allows workers to sue their employers over labor code violations on behalf of the state. Business groups had waged a multi-year campaign against the law and agreed to withdraw a ballot measure that would have repealed it in exchange for the changes. Employees will now only be able to sue for labor violations they have personally experienced in the past year, rather than being able to sue on behalf of their coworkers. Also, the share of the penalty that employees receive will increase and penalties will be capped for employers who take steps to correct their labor violations. Governor Gavin Newsom and legislative leaders announced the deal after months of discussions between labor advocates and business groups.
Daily News & Commentary
Start your day with our roundup of the latest labor developments. See all
January 19
Department of Education pauses wage garnishment; Valero Energy announces layoffs; Labor Department wins back wages for healthcare workers.
January 18
Met Museum workers unionize; a new report reveals a $0.76 average tip for gig workers in NYC; and U.S. workers receive the smallest share of capital since 1947.
January 16
The NLRB publishes its first decision since regaining a quorum; Minneapolis labor unions call for a general strike in response to the ICE killing of Renee Good; federal workers rally in DC to show support for the Protecting America’s Workforce Act.
January 15
New investigation into the Secretary of Labor; New Jersey bill to protect child content creators; NIOSH reinstates hundreds of employees.
January 14
The Supreme Court will not review its opt-in test in ADEA cases in an age discrimination and federal wage law violation case; the Fifth Circuit rules that a jury will determine whether Enterprise Products unfairly terminated a Black truck driver; and an employee at Berry Global Inc. will receive a trial after being fired for requesting medical leave for a disability-related injury.
January 13
15,000 New York City nurses go on strike; First Circuit rules against ferry employees challenging a COVID-19 vaccine mandate; New York lawmakers propose amendments to Trapped at Work Act.