
Mila Rostain is a student at Harvard Law School.
In today’s News and Commentary, a district judge issues a preliminary injunction blocking agencies from implementing Trump’s executive order eliminating collective bargaining for federal workers, workers organize for the reinstatement of two doctors who were put on administrative leave after using an internal directory to organize their coworkers, and Governor Lamont vetoes unemployment benefits for striking workers.
On Tuesday, US District Court for the Northern District of California Judge James Donato issued a preliminary injunction blocking agencies from implementing President Trump’s executive order eliminating collective bargaining rights for federal workers. The executive order invoked the national security exception to exclude certain agencies from the Federal Service-Labor Management Relations Statute. Along with the executive order, the White House published a fact sheet that singled out unions resisting Trump. Judge Donato held that the six unions who sued were likely to succeed on the merits of their claim that the executive order retaliated against the unions in violation of their First Amendment free speech rights and that they would likely face irreparable harm without the preliminary injunction. President of the National Association of Government Employees, David Holway, stated, “the court made it clear: national security cannot be used as a smokescreen to silence federal workers.” The preliminary injunction comes as the D.C. Circuit stayed a similar injunction issued by Judge Paul Friedman regarding the same executive order’s application to the National Treasury Employees Union.
Workers at University Hospitals, a healthcare system based in Cleveland, Ohio, launched a petition calling for the reinstatement of two doctors involved in union efforts. University Hospitals claims that the doctors were put on administrative leave because they improperly accessed an internal directory that includes personal cell phone numbers of doctors. According to the petition, the physicians did not violate a policy against such use of the internal directory, and that instead, University Hospitals removed the two physicians in response to their union activity.
Finally, Connecticut Governor Ned Lamont vetoed legislation that would have granted unemployment benefits to striking workers after two weeks. As Meredith previously pointed out, Lamont was expected to veto the legislation. Lamont argued that the bill would have fundamentally altered the purpose of unemployment insurance, because unemployment benefits are intended for those “who are out of work through no fault of their own.” Lamont expressed concern that the bill would have driven business from the state. Union leaders had argued that providing unemployment benefits to striking workers after two weeks was one of the ways the state could even the playing field without running into preemption issues.
Daily News & Commentary
Start your day with our roundup of the latest labor developments. See all
June 26
A district judge issues a preliminary injunction blocking agencies from implementing Trump’s executive order eliminating collective bargaining for federal workers; workers organize for the reinstatement of two doctors who were put on administrative leave after union activity; and Lamont vetoes unemployment benefits for striking workers.
June 25
Some circuits show less deference to NLRB; 3d Cir. affirms return to broader concerted activity definition; changes to federal workforce excluded from One Big Beautiful Bill.
June 24
In today’s news and commentary, the DOL proposes new wage and hour rules, Ford warns of EV battery manufacturing trouble, and California reaches an agreement to delay an in-person work mandate for state employees. The Trump Administration’s Department of Labor has advanced a series of proposals to update federal wage and hour rules. First, the […]
June 23
Supreme Court interprets ADA; Department of Labor effectively kills Biden-era regulation; NYC announces new wages for rideshare drivers.
June 22
California lawmakers challenge Garmon preemption in the absence of an NLRB quorum and Utah organizers successfully secure a ballot referendum to overturn HB 267.
June 20
Three state bills challenge Garmon preemption; Wisconsin passes a bill establishing portable benefits for gig workers; and a sharp increase in workplace ICE raids contribute to a nationwide labor shortage.