
John Fry is a student at Harvard Law School.
In today’s news and commentary, the Eighth Circuit rebuffs the NLRB regarding construction unions; Harris continues to garner union support; and detained migrant workers speak out.
The Eighth Circuit overturned the NLRB’s ruling in Enright Seeding last week, ruling that the Board’s standard for converting project labor agreement relationships into full-fledged collective bargaining relationships was too lenient. Under Section 8(f) of the NLRA, PLAs in the construction industry allow unions to represent workers as soon as a project begins, without a union election. However, an 8(f) bargaining relationship gives the union fewer advantages than a normal collective bargaining relationship under Section 9(a). Accordingly, unions with PLAs may “convert” from 8(f) to 9(a) status. The Board’s 2022 Enright decision had held that an 8(f) union and an employer could stipulate by contract that the union had demonstrated the majority support of workers needed to perform conversion and attain 9(a) status. However, the Eighth Circuit held that contract language alone is insufficient, and that a union must be able to produce actual evidence of its majority support in order for workers’ free choice to be adequately protected.
Presumptive Democratic nominee Kamala Harris continues to seek the support of unions, speaking at the American Federation of Teachers convention in Houston last week. In her speech, Harris voiced her continued support for the PRO Act and assured members that she would continue and build upon the pro-union policy work of the Biden administration. Harris also spoke out on gun violence, an issue of concern to many teachers, saying: “We want to ban assault weapons, and [Republicans] want to ban books.” AFT, with well over 1 million members, was the first major union to endorse Harris after President Biden announced his withdrawal from the race.
Workers are speaking out at private immigration detention centers operated by the GEO Group in California, protesting the poor conditions and low wages they endure while working during their detention. The detainees, working for as little as $1 a day, have initiated a labor and hunger strike to raise awareness about their treatment. California’s Division of Occupational Safety and Health has begun investigating conditions at the centers, but detained migrants are facing retaliation for cooperating in the investigation. Accordingly, Cal/OSHA is seeking to use the Biden administration’s Deferred Action for Labor Enforcement, a program meant to curb retaliation against undocumented workers, to aid the proceedings.
Daily News & Commentary
Start your day with our roundup of the latest labor developments. See all
June 3
Federal judge blocks Trump's attack on TSA collective bargaining rights; NLRB argues that Grindr's Return-to-Office policy was union busting; International Trade Union Confederation report highlights global decline in workers' rights.
June 2
Proposed budgets for DOL and NLRB show cuts on the horizon; Oregon law requiring LPAs in cannabis dispensaries struck down.
June 1
In today’s news and commentary, the Ninth Circuit upholds a preliminary injunction against the Trump Administration, a federal judge vacates parts of the EEOC’s pregnancy accommodation rules, and video game workers reach a tentative agreement with Microsoft. In a 2-1 decision issued on Friday, the Ninth Circuit upheld a preliminary injunction against the Trump Administration […]
May 30
Trump's tariffs temporarily reinstated after brief nationwide injunction; Louisiana Bill targets payroll deduction of union dues; Colorado Supreme Court to consider a self-defense exception to at-will employment
May 29
AFGE argues termination of collective bargaining agreement violates the union’s First Amendment rights; agricultural workers challenge card check laws; and the California Court of Appeal reaffirms San Francisco city workers’ right to strike.
May 28
A proposal to make the NLRB purely adjudicatory; a work stoppage among court-appointed lawyers in Massachusetts; portable benefits laws gain ground