Jon Weinberg is a student at Harvard Law School.
The recent settlement announced between Uber and drivers in California and Massachusetts in suits over driver classification (analyzed here) continues to receive extensive coverage. While questions about the “drivers’ association” have been highlighted in recent commentary, controversy has also arisen over the settlement amounts and how the settlement treats the tipping of drivers.
Settlement Amounts
MarketWatch has analyzed payments under the proposed settlement in the following tables. Notably, “the listed settlement amount would be doubled for drivers who had opted out of 2013 and 2014 Uber arbitration clauses,” and the nine named plaintiffs will receive an additional enhancement estimated at $7,500 each.

Tables by MarketWatch
As these tables reflect, nearly 80% of the 243,319 California class members will receive less than $200 on average. California class members who drove up to 10,000 miles for Uber will get no more than $455 on average, while those who drove more than 10,000 miles and up to 25,000 receive $1,137 on average. Massachusetts drivers who logged the most miles, however, won’t even be this well-compensated: those who drove in excess of 25,000 miles will receive $979 on average.
Driver Tipping
Money focuses on the tipping provisions of the settlement. Drivers will be able to solicit tips and place signs in their vehicles noting tips are not included, but passengers will not be able to tip via the app and its cashless, automated payment system. (Uber’s chief competitor, Lyft, allows tipping through its app.) On the one hand, Money theorizes that drivers will now be incentivized to provide lower passenger ratings for those who do not tip. On the other hand, Uber passengers have become accustomed to not tipping and not needing to have cash on hand. The actual impact of the tipping settlement will depend on which dynamic proves more important.
Daily News & Commentary
Start your day with our roundup of the latest labor developments. See all
November 30
In today’s news and commentary, the MSPB issues its first precedential ruling since regaining a quorum; Amazon workers lead strikes and demonstrations in multiple countries; and Starbucks workers expand their indefinite strike to additional locations. Last week, the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB) released its first precedential decision in eight months. The MSPB had been […]
November 28
Lawsuit against EEOC for failure to investigate disparate-impact claims dismissed; DHS to end TPS for Haiti; Appeal of Cemex decision in Ninth Circuit may soon resume
November 27
Amazon wins preliminary injunction against New York’s private sector bargaining law; ALJs resume decisions; and the CFPB intends to make unilateral changes without bargaining.
November 26
In today’s news and commentary, NLRB lawyers urge the 3rd Circuit to follow recent district court cases that declined to enjoin Board proceedings; the percentage of unemployed Americans with a college degree reaches its highest level since tracking began in 1992; and a member of the House proposes a bill that would require secret ballot […]
November 25
In today’s news and commentary, OSHA fines Taylor Foods, Santa Fe raises their living wage, and a date is set for a Senate committee to consider Trump’s NLRB nominee. OSHA has issued an approximately $1.1 million dollar fine to Taylor Farms New Jersey, a subsidiary of Taylor Fresh Foods, after identifying repeated and serious safety […]
November 24
Labor leaders criticize tariffs; White House cancels jobs report; and student organizers launch chaperone program for noncitizens.