Jon Weinberg is a student at Harvard Law School.
The recent settlement announced between Uber and drivers in California and Massachusetts in suits over driver classification (analyzed here) continues to receive extensive coverage. While questions about the “drivers’ association” have been highlighted in recent commentary, controversy has also arisen over the settlement amounts and how the settlement treats the tipping of drivers.
Settlement Amounts
MarketWatch has analyzed payments under the proposed settlement in the following tables. Notably, “the listed settlement amount would be doubled for drivers who had opted out of 2013 and 2014 Uber arbitration clauses,” and the nine named plaintiffs will receive an additional enhancement estimated at $7,500 each.
Tables by MarketWatch
As these tables reflect, nearly 80% of the 243,319 California class members will receive less than $200 on average. California class members who drove up to 10,000 miles for Uber will get no more than $455 on average, while those who drove more than 10,000 miles and up to 25,000 receive $1,137 on average. Massachusetts drivers who logged the most miles, however, won’t even be this well-compensated: those who drove in excess of 25,000 miles will receive $979 on average.
Driver Tipping
Money focuses on the tipping provisions of the settlement. Drivers will be able to solicit tips and place signs in their vehicles noting tips are not included, but passengers will not be able to tip via the app and its cashless, automated payment system. (Uber’s chief competitor, Lyft, allows tipping through its app.) On the one hand, Money theorizes that drivers will now be incentivized to provide lower passenger ratings for those who do not tip. On the other hand, Uber passengers have become accustomed to not tipping and not needing to have cash on hand. The actual impact of the tipping settlement will depend on which dynamic proves more important.
Daily News & Commentary
Start your day with our roundup of the latest labor developments. See all
April 18
Two major New York City unions endorse Cuomo for mayor; Committee on Education and the Workforce requests an investigation into a major healthcare union’s spending; Unions launch a national pro bono legal network for federal workers.
April 17
Utahns sign a petition supporting referendum to repeal law prohibiting public sector collective bargaining; the US District Court for the District of Columbia declines to dismiss claims filed by the AFL-CIO against several government agencies; and the DOGE faces reports that staffers of the agency accessed the NLRB’s sensitive case files.
April 16
7th Circuit questions the relevance of NLRB precedent after Loper Bright, unions seek to defend silica rule, and Abrego Garcia's union speaks out.
April 15
In today’s news and commentary, SAG-AFTRA reaches a tentative agreement, AFT sues the Trump Administration, and California offers its mediation services to make up for federal cuts. SAG-AFTRA, the union representing approximately 133,000 commercial actors and singers, has reached a tentative agreement with advertisers and advertising agencies. These companies were represented in contract negotiations by […]
April 14
Department of Labor publishes unemployment statistics; Kentucky unions resist deportation orders; Teamsters win three elections in Texas.
April 13
Shawn Fain equivocates on tariffs; Trump quietly ends federal union dues collection; pro-Palestinian Google employees sue over firings.