
Gilbert Placeres is a student at Harvard Law School.
In today’s News and Commentary, the Trump administration’s attacks on the federal workforce make their way through the courts while Elon Musk sends another volley, Trump’s NLRB requests a Cemex bargaining order, and care workers get a seat at the table in Colorado through the Direct Care Workforce Stabilization Board.
Three updates in President Trump’s slashing of the federal workforce and supposed diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs. A federal Washington, DC district court judge declined to issue a preliminary injunction of President Trump’s termination of probationary employees and other reductions in the federal workforce, saying the claims should be brought to the Federal Labor Relations Authority (FLRA) instead. On the other hand, another federal district court judge, in Maryland, issued a preliminary injunction halting the Trump administration from enforcing the executive orders against DEI programs because they are unconstitutionally vague and violate free speech rights. In support of his ruling, the judge cited the lack of definitions of terms like “DEI” or “equity-related,” lack of support for their illegality, and that the orders constituted viewpoint discrimination. Relatedly, on Saturday, Elon Musk emailed federal employees asking for a report of “what they got done last week” by 11:59pm Monday. A “failure to respond will be taken as a resignation,” according to the email.
Last week, NLRB prosecutors requested a Cemex bargaining order against Starbucks for its violations at a Missouri store. This request comes even after the prosecutors asked for an extension to make sure their post-hearing brief “reflect[ed] the views” of the agency’s new acting General Counsel, William Cowen. The order, under the Board’s 2023 Cemex Construction Material Pacific LLC decision, would require Starbucks to negotiate with Workers United at the store even after the employees voted 11–8 against unionizing, because of the companies’ NLRA violations in the run up to the election. Those violations, board attorneys argued, eroded what was majority support for unionization at the time the election petition was filed. Acting GC Cowen previously rescinded a memo from President Biden’s GC Jennifer Abruzzo regarding applying the Cemex decision “pending further guidance”
In In These Times, Osita Nwanevu continued his series on cooperatives and innovative worker organizing by profiling Colorado’s Direct Care Workforce Stabilization Board. The Board came out of efforts by direct care workers in the state, 41% of whom are on public assistance, to improve their low wages, conditions, and meager benefits. The 15-member Board was created by the state legislature at the urging of SEIU-backed Colorado Care Workers Unite and brings together direct care workers, patients, employers, and state officials to issue recommendations for the industry. It is one of nine industry standard boards established in six states and three cities since 2018 as an alternative and novel form of worker power. Direct care was a fit for this model because only 8% of the workforce is unionized and the work is isolated, highly individualized, and diffused amongst a large number of employers. While the Board can only issue recommendations, labor advocates hope it will be a lever to raise wages and improve conditions. One of the problems it seeks to address is the need to attract more workers into the field given an aging workforce and rising demand.
Daily News & Commentary
Start your day with our roundup of the latest labor developments. See all
September 12
Zohran Mamdani calls on FIFA to end dynamic pricing for the World Cup; the San Francisco Office of Labor Standards Enforcement opens a probe into Scale AI’s labor practices; and union members organize immigration defense trainings.
September 11
California rideshare deal advances; Boeing reaches tentative agreement with union; FTC scrutinizes healthcare noncompetes.
September 10
A federal judge denies a motion by the Trump Administration to dismiss a lawsuit led by the American Federation of Government Employees against President Trump for his mass layoffs of federal workers; the Supreme Court grants a stay on a federal district court order that originally barred ICE agents from questioning and detaining individuals based on their presence at a particular location, the type of work they do, their race or ethnicity, and their accent while speaking English or Spanish; and a hospital seeks to limit OSHA's ability to cite employers for failing to halt workplace violence without a specific regulation in place.
September 9
Ninth Circuit revives Trader Joe’s lawsuit against employee union; new bill aims to make striking workers eligible for benefits; university lecturer who praised Hitler gets another chance at First Amendment claims.
September 8
DC Circuit to rule on deference to NLRB, more vaccine exemption cases, Senate considers ban on forced arbitration for age discrimination claims.
September 7
Another weak jobs report, the Trump Administration's refusal to arbitrate with federal workers, and a district court judge's order on the constitutionality of the Laken-Riley Act.