Anita Alem is a student at Harvard Law School.
In today’s News and Commentary, the NLRB finds Starbucks made illegal threats to workers during a union election, an Illinois bill that is likely soon to become law would require that workers accrue paid time off, and the UK cost of living strike continues.
On Tuesday, an administrative law judge at the NLRB found that Starbucks violated labor law during a union election at its flagship Seattle Roastery. Starbucks illegally told workers that unionization would be futile and threatened to reduce benefits upon unionization during a union campaign at its flagship Seattle Roastery. More than 275 Starbucks locations, nationwide, have joined the wave of unionizations; the Roastery is particularly significant as a large location with 100 workers.
Governor J.B. Pritzker of Illinois is set to sign a bill that would require employers to ensure employees accrue up to 40 hours of paid time off as part of their benefits package. The bill would still permit employers to require seven-days’ notice for foreseeable needs, but provides protection from employer retaliation. While fourteen other states and the District of Columbia mandate some amount of paid sick leave time, the Illinois bill is broader, permitting time off for any reason. Several other states are also currently considering or likely to consider bills to expand leave, including Minnesota, Michigan, Connecticut, and California.
Massive strikes continue in the UK as workers protest against the cost of living crisis, which has raised grocery prices at a record rate of nearly 17% inflation, and nearly 11% inflation across the economy. More than 500,000 workers are on strike, including 300,000 teachers, as well as civil servants, university workers, and train and bus drivers. The Parliament is seeking to stymie strikes by mandating “minimum service levels” in some sectors that would permit workers to be fired for going on strike.
Daily News & Commentary
Start your day with our roundup of the latest labor developments. See all
July 3
Unions seek a preliminary injunction to prevent USDA downsizing; the D.C. District Court issues a preliminary injunction against new student loan regulations; Matt Bruenig releases an analysis of Starbucks’ ongoing legal battle against Starbucks Workers United.
July 2
First Circuit denies federal worker unions’ mandamus petition; federal court denies preliminary injunction against new union reporting rule; House introduces the Securing Agriculture’s Workforce Act.
July 1
Trump nominates Keith Sonderling as Labor Secretary; DOL eliminates disparate-impact liability from Title VI regulations; OPM finalizes rule allowing suitability-based removal of federal employees for post-appointment conduct.
June 30
SCOTUS ends removal protections for agencies; staff at NYC cocktail bar vote to unionize.
June 29
In today’s News and Commentary, student-athletes file a class action suit challenging the NCAA’s new Age-Based Rule, a federal judge declines to issue a preliminary injunction against FEMA’s reduction in force but expedites proceedings, and Gavin Newsom opposes California’s proposed billionaire tax in favor of a federal approach. On Thursday, DeJuan Campbell, at basketball player […]
June 28
Philadelphia utility workers announce July 4 strike; national parks workers vote to unionize; Michigan considers “right to disconnect” bill.