Jon Weinberg is a student at Harvard Law School.
As Ryan highlighted in his post earlier this morning, the Seattle City Council unanimously passed historic legislation yesterday that gives independent contractor drivers the right to collectively bargain, including those for gig economy “transportation network companies” Uber and Lyft. The bill can be read in its entirety here.
Buzzfeed published a comprehensive summary on the legislation, the first of its kind passed by an American municipality, and its implications both in Seattle and nationally. Under the National Labor Relations Act, only drivers determined to be employees have collective bargaining rights. In Seattle, drivers would have similar rights despite their classification. Seattle Mayor Ed Murray will not sign the bill but also will not veto it, assuring its passage. The unionization process for Seattle drivers, if the bill survives legal challenges, will be as follows:
First, drivers will have to vote on whether they even want to seek representation as a group; if they do, they’ll have to select what group they want to be represented by. The city will approve groups that meet the necessary qualifications; they must be registered nonprofits experienced in negotiations between employers and contractors. Uber, Lyft and the other companies will then be required to share lists of people who work near full-time for them as drivers with the third-party group. The “near-full-time” classification will be based on a multi-part formula; to earn a vote, drivers have to work at least 80% of what full-time employment would be.
Professor Sachs noted that the Seattle City Council will almost certainly be challenged in court:
Benjamin Sachs, a Harvard Law School professor who has been following regulation of the gig economy closely, said Uber’s legal claims “will likely be federal labor preemption” (federal precedents that say contract workers can’t organize trumps local government) “and/or antitrust violations.” But, Sachs added: “There are very strong defenses to both legal attacks.”
The Teamsters supported the bill, and have set up an organization (the Apps-Based Drivers Association) that would aim to represent drivers should the law go into effect. Notably, the bill passed while Uber actively lobbies for state legislation mandating that drivers be classified as independent contractors. If other municipalities follow Seattle’s lead, Uber drivers may increasingly have a collective vehicle through which they can gain improved pay and benefits, no matter their worker classification.
Daily News & Commentary
Start your day with our roundup of the latest labor developments. See all
April 24
NLRB seeks to compel Amazon to collectively bargain with San Francisco warehouse workers, DoorDash delivery workers and members of Los Deliveristas Unidos rally for pay transparency, and NLRB takes step to drop lawsuit against SpaceX over the firing of employees who criticized Elon Musk.
April 22
DOGE staffers eye NLRB for potential reorganization; attacks on federal workforce impact Trump-supporting areas; Utah governor acknowledges backlash to public-sector union ban
April 21
Bryan Johnson’s ULP saga before the NLRB continues; top law firms opt to appease the EEOC in its anti-DEI demands.
April 20
In today’s news and commentary, the Supreme Court rules for Cornell employees in an ERISA suit, the Sixth Circuit addresses whether the EFAA applies to a sexual harassment claim, and DOGE gains access to sensitive labor data on immigrants. On Thursday, the Supreme Court made it easier for employees to bring ERISA suits when their […]
April 18
Two major New York City unions endorse Cuomo for mayor; Committee on Education and the Workforce requests an investigation into a major healthcare union’s spending; Unions launch a national pro bono legal network for federal workers.
April 17
Utahns sign a petition supporting referendum to repeal law prohibiting public sector collective bargaining; the US District Court for the District of Columbia declines to dismiss claims filed by the AFL-CIO against several government agencies; and the DOGE faces reports that staffers of the agency accessed the NLRB’s sensitive case files.