![](https://onlabor.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/D7K_1722-scaled.jpg)
Sunah Chang is a student at Harvard Law School.
In today’s news and commentary: businesses challenge the Department of Labor’s new overtime rule in federal court, Illinois grows closer to passing a state-wide ban on captive audience meetings, and railroad workers’ unions raise concerns over the increased use of remote-controlled trains.
Business groups have launched a legal challenge to the new Department of Labor (“DOL”) rule that seeks to expand overtime pay requirements. The new rule, which the DOL finalized back in April, is set to automatically extend overtime pay to workers making less than $58,656 a year, starting on July 1, 2025. In an attempt to block this new rule from taking effect, a coalition of businesses has filed a lawsuit in the Eastern District of Texas, which alleges that the rule exceeds the DOL’s authority under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”) and violates the Administrative Procedures Act. Under the FLSA, employees who are “employed in a bona fide executive, administrative, or professional . . . capacity” are exempt from overtime pay protections. The lawsuit claims that the new rule goes beyond what is permitted under the FLSA because the rule sets a salary threshold that is “is so high that it is no longer a plausible proxy for delimiting which jobs fall within the statutory terms ‘executive,’ ‘administrative,’ or ‘professional.’”
In the meantime, another case that is pending on the Fifth Circuit risks significantly undermining the DOL’s authority to regulate overtime pay. Mayfield v. Department of Labor involves a challenge to a Trump-era overtime rule; on appeal, the plaintiffs have argued that the FLSA does not authorize the DOL to consider workers’ salaries in determining whether they are exempt from overtime. If the Fifth Circuit sides with the plaintiffs in the Mayfield case, the current Biden DOL rule will likely be invalidated on similar grounds.
In Illinois, state lawmakers have approved a new bill prohibiting captive audience meetings—mandatory workplace meetings organized by employers with the purpose of discouraging workers from engaging in union activity. The bill also creates a right of action for individual workers to sue their employers if they are punished for refusing to attend captive audience meetings. If the bill is signed by Governor Pritzer, Illinois would join a half dozen other states that have passed captive audience bans in the past few years.
Lastly, unions representing railroad workers have begun to voice their concern about the safety risks of remote-controlled trains. In the last several years, some railroad companies have swapped out teams of engineers supervising the tracks from the front cabin for single remote-control operators, who may not even be aboard on the trains. While railroad companies claim that remote-controlled trains have a better safety record than traditional trains, remote-controlled trains have caused several high-profile accidents in recent years, including one that resulted in the death of a railroad inspector. In response, union officials have called for enhanced safety review and increased inspections of remote-controlled trains.
Daily News & Commentary
Start your day with our roundup of the latest labor developments. See all
July 15
Workday bias suit moves forward; DOL proposes new LMRDA rule; Bronx Defenders to go on ULP strike
July 14
Teamsters president to speak at RNC; youth work permit requirement rollbacks; eulogies to Jane McAlevey.
July 12
Dollar Tree and OSHA settle; union leaders split over Biden support; new report on low wages.
July 11
President Biden meets with union leadership and a New York law firm announces new applicant screening policy regarding student protest activity.
July 10
NSEU calls for indefinite strike; Disney may face nation's largest strike this year; UAW monitor reveals details of investigation
July 9
Bloomberg publishes an investigation into sexual harassment at SpaceX; Paris airport workers announce strike ahead of the Olympics; and Korean autoworkers reach a tentative deal with Hyundai.