
Otto Barenberg is a student at Harvard Law School and the Digital Director of OnLabor.
In today’s news and commentary, Washington moves closer to banning captive audience meetings and Subway employees strike over workplace violence.
On Thursday, Washington legislators passed a bill (SB 5778) banning captive audience meetings. Governor Jay Inslee (D) has voiced his support for the measure, which, if signed into law, would make Washington the sixth state with a captive audience ban after Oregon, Connecticut, Maine, Minnesota, and New York. At the federal level, although National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) General Counsel Jennifer Abruzzo contends captive audience meetings are inherently coercive and violate national labor law, the Board has not yet issued a ruling on the issue.
Worker advocates and unions celebrated the Washington bill’s passage, saying that a ban on mandatory anti-union meetings would deprive companies of a powerful weapon in their union-busting arsenals. Rick Hicks, Teamsters Western Region International Vice President and President of Teamsters Joint Council 28, commented: “Unions are fundamentally about economic democracy, which is why we need to make the process of organizing as democratic as possible by putting an end to this autocratic practice.” However, business groups have brought litigation challenging bans on captive audience meetings in Minnesota and Connecticut, arguing that they constitute “viewpoint-based discrimination” and are preempted by the National Labor Relations Act. Supporters counter that the bans leave employers free to express their views on unions and prohibit only a requirement that workers listen as a condition of their employment.
On Friday, employees at a Subway in western Los Angeles launched a three-day strike in response to a wave of violence at their sandwich shop. Workers described harrowing interactions with customers, including one man who yelled expletives at employees while brandishing a machete. “The feeling that we were alone and that our management would not help us was disheartening,” Subway employee Sabina Gutierrez told the Los Angeles Daily News. She and other Subway employees are demanding the company provide de-escalation trainings, health care for workers subjected to workplace violence, and heightened security. Workers are also pushing Los Angeles to enact a Fast Food Fair Work ordinance requiring “know your rights” trainings, as well as paid time off and fair scheduling practices. The strike marks an early test for the California Fast Food Workers Union (CFFWU), the new Service Employees International Union (SEIU)-backed representative of the western Los Angeles Subway workers. In a novel approach, CFFWU aims to compel fast food companies to engage in sectoral bargaining by expanding its membership across California’s fast-food industry, without seeking NLRB certification at the establishment level.
Daily News & Commentary
Start your day with our roundup of the latest labor developments. See all
August 20
5th Circuit upholds injunctions based on challenges to NLRB constitutionality; Illinois to counteract federal changes to wage and hour, health and safety laws.
August 19
Amazon’s NLRA violations, the end of the Air Canada strike, and a court finds no unconstitutional taking in reducing pension benefits
August 18
Labor groups sue local Washington officials; the NYC Council seeks to override mayoral veto; and an NLRB official rejects state adjudication efforts.
August 17
The Canadian government ends a national flight attendants’ strike, and Illinois enacts laws preserving federal worker protections.
August 15
Columbia University quietly replaces graduate student union labor with non-union adjunct workers; the DC Circuit Court lifts the preliminary injunction on CFPB firings; and Grubhub to pay $24.75M to settle California driver class action.
August 14
Judge Pechman denies the Trump Administration’s motion to dismiss claims brought by unions representing TSA employees; the Trump Administration continues efforts to strip federal employees of collective bargaining rights; and the National Association of Agriculture Employees seeks legal relief after the USDA stopped recognizing the union.