Hannah Finnie is a writer in Washington, D.C. interested in the intersections of work and culture. She is a graduate of Harvard Law School.
Minneapolis teachers and staff are on day nine of their strike over higher, equitable pay and creating more protections for teachers and staffers of color. Black teachers and staffers went to district headquarters earlier this week alongside the Minneapolis NAACP to underscore the need for greater protections for educators and staffers of color.
The strike also has student support: around 100 students staged a sit-in at the school district headquarters, voicing support for the teachers and staffers’ demands. They eventually met with the school district superintendent.
The school district is trying to force an end to the strike by calling on teachers and staffers to return to work and promising that negotiations will continue while they’re working. The district also says that the strike is hurting children – a notion that students have pushed back on. A student who helped organize the sit-in told the StarTribune: “[District officials] talked a lot about how what the teachers are doing … is hurting our students. But it’s not really hurting us because we’re here to support our teachers, the same way that they’re here to support us.”
Minneapolis schools’ food service workers union also announced yesterday they reached a tentative deal with the school district, including a raise of up to 24% over three years. The agreement comes on the heels of the workers threatening to strike earlier this week.
Faculty at Howard University, a historically black university in Washington, D.C., have announced their intent to strike next week after their union said the university engaged in bad faith bargaining during contract negotiations.
Finally, Congress heard testimony yesterday from various current and former employees of the federal court system who say that workplace harassment and discrimination runs rampant in the judiciary. Some lawmakers have already introduced legislation that would grant federal judiciary employees the same anti-discrimination rights other government employees already have, and would also protect whistleblowers. One of the people who testified said that under the Justice Department’s interpretation of the court’s current anti-discrimination rules, federal judiciary employees have no remedy if they are being discriminated against on the basis of their sex.
According to the Washington Post, the proposed law would “create an independent special counsel to investigate workplace complaints and report its findings to Congress and an oversight commission made up of people with experience enforcing civil rights laws.”
The judiciary has attempted to block the law, arguing that Congress should not interfere with how another branch of government chooses to govern itself.
Daily News & Commentary
Start your day with our roundup of the latest labor developments. See all
April 24
NLRB seeks to compel Amazon to collectively bargain with San Francisco warehouse workers, DoorDash delivery workers and members of Los Deliveristas Unidos rally for pay transparency, and NLRB takes step to drop lawsuit against SpaceX over the firing of employees who criticized Elon Musk.
April 22
DOGE staffers eye NLRB for potential reorganization; attacks on federal workforce impact Trump-supporting areas; Utah governor acknowledges backlash to public-sector union ban
April 21
Bryan Johnson’s ULP saga before the NLRB continues; top law firms opt to appease the EEOC in its anti-DEI demands.
April 20
In today’s news and commentary, the Supreme Court rules for Cornell employees in an ERISA suit, the Sixth Circuit addresses whether the EFAA applies to a sexual harassment claim, and DOGE gains access to sensitive labor data on immigrants. On Thursday, the Supreme Court made it easier for employees to bring ERISA suits when their […]
April 18
Two major New York City unions endorse Cuomo for mayor; Committee on Education and the Workforce requests an investigation into a major healthcare union’s spending; Unions launch a national pro bono legal network for federal workers.
April 17
Utahns sign a petition supporting referendum to repeal law prohibiting public sector collective bargaining; the US District Court for the District of Columbia declines to dismiss claims filed by the AFL-CIO against several government agencies; and the DOGE faces reports that staffers of the agency accessed the NLRB’s sensitive case files.