Mackenzie Bouverat is a student at Harvard Law School.
Following the victory of President-elect Joe Biden, focus has pivoted away from the tumult of electoral politics to the work of governance. Given the likelihood of a Republican-majority in the Senate, the incoming Administration is likely to face difficulty enacting the more ambitious facets of his labor agenda, as Deanna wrote yesterday. However, observers are speculating about the various mechanisms–including more robust OSHA enforcement and pro-labor appointments to the NLRB–through which the President-elect could see through parts of his agenda without resorting to the legislative process.
Last Friday, the Labor Department announced the addition of 638,000 jobs last month—the sixth straight monthly gain—and the jobless rate fell a percentage point to 6.9%. Of the 22 million jobs lost in March and April, the job market has now recovered 12.1 million. But according to the Wall Street Journal and CNBC, this is little cause for economic optimism: the recent record-breaking explosion in new coronavirus infections is likely prompt cities and states to shutter businesses again and force consumers to stay at home, reducing spending and inducing employers to cut labor costs.
Federal stimulus relief talks remain at a bitter standstill, and the majority of commenters expect no significant progress on a bipartisan “lame duck” package until January. Mitch McConnell has already indicated his unwillingness to compromise with Democrats on a “big stimulus” bill, indicating that he believes that small package is sufficient in light of the better-than-expected jobs report.
During a disconcerting investor call last Thursday, Uber CEO Dara Khosrowshahi indicated that the ride-share company’s intention to extend Prop 22 to other states: “Going forward, you will see us more loudly advocate for new laws like Prop 22, which we believe strike the balance between preserving the flexibility that drivers value so much, while adding protections that all gig workers deserve […] We want to have a dialogue with governments [in] other states.” Anthony Foxx, chief policy officer at Lyft, expressed a similar desire to export the ballot measure in an interview last Wednesday with The Hill: “Ideally, now that this issue has been resolved in California we can have a broader conversation about how to replicate something like Prop 22.”
Daily News & Commentary
Start your day with our roundup of the latest labor developments. See all
September 15
Unemployment claims rise; a federal court hands victory to government employees union; and employers fire workers over social media posts.
September 14
Workers at Boeing reject the company’s third contract proposal; NLRB Acting General Counsel William Cohen plans to sue New York over the state’s trigger bill; Air Canada flight attendants reject a tentative contract.
September 12
Zohran Mamdani calls on FIFA to end dynamic pricing for the World Cup; the San Francisco Office of Labor Standards Enforcement opens a probe into Scale AI’s labor practices; and union members organize immigration defense trainings.
September 11
California rideshare deal advances; Boeing reaches tentative agreement with union; FTC scrutinizes healthcare noncompetes.
September 10
A federal judge denies a motion by the Trump Administration to dismiss a lawsuit led by the American Federation of Government Employees against President Trump for his mass layoffs of federal workers; the Supreme Court grants a stay on a federal district court order that originally barred ICE agents from questioning and detaining individuals based on their presence at a particular location, the type of work they do, their race or ethnicity, and their accent while speaking English or Spanish; and a hospital seeks to limit OSHA's ability to cite employers for failing to halt workplace violence without a specific regulation in place.
September 9
Ninth Circuit revives Trader Joe’s lawsuit against employee union; new bill aims to make striking workers eligible for benefits; university lecturer who praised Hitler gets another chance at First Amendment claims.