Yesterday, the Department of Labor announced the final overtime rule, which will take effect on December 1 this year, and employers will have six months to comply. The final rule raises the salary threshold from $455 per week to $913 per week, or $47,476 per year. The rule will also automatically update this salary threshold every three years.
The New York Times editorial board praised the new overtime rule, calling it a “rare victory for fair pay.” Employers can respond to the new overtime rule in different ways: changing the pay structure for employees below the new threshold to an hourly rate; raising employees’ salaries above the threshold; hiring new people to do the work performed by those putting in unpaid overtime; or cutting the base salaries for employees who work over 40 hours a week, anticipating additional overtime pay. The board explained the new threshold will make about one-third of salaried employers eligible for overtime pay, as opposed to the current seven percent.
According to Politico, House Republicans are already considering using the appropriations process to block the new overtime rule. Rep. Tom Cole of Oklahoma, who heads the Labor-HHS-Education subcommittee, suggests they are considering attaching a rider to undo the rule.
Small businesses have expressed worry that the new rule will clash with their entrepreneurial business models, according to the New York Times. One small business owner explained her company is currently flexible, allowing employees to leave work for a few hours when necessary for personal reasons, and that tracking hours will get in the way of that flexibility. Indeed, private employers will no longer be able to offer comp time–giving employees who work extra time now time off later–for employees making under the threshold, although that will be permitted in the public sector. Another business owner, looking at his options, suggested he may hire more freelancers and independent contractors, at least at busier times of the year.
Politico reports the White House issued its spring regulatory agenda, including future Labor Department rulemakings. The Department of Defense and other agencies are set to release the “blacklisting” rule in August, which requires federal contractors to disclose past labor and employment law violations, and subjects egregious offenders to debarment. You can read the regulatory agenda here.
Daily News & Commentary
Start your day with our roundup of the latest labor developments. See all
September 12
Zohran Mamdani calls on FIFA to end dynamic pricing for the World Cup; the San Francisco Office of Labor Standards Enforcement opens a probe into Scale AI’s labor practices; and union members organize immigration defense trainings.
September 11
California rideshare deal advances; Boeing reaches tentative agreement with union; FTC scrutinizes healthcare noncompetes.
September 10
A federal judge denies a motion by the Trump Administration to dismiss a lawsuit led by the American Federation of Government Employees against President Trump for his mass layoffs of federal workers; the Supreme Court grants a stay on a federal district court order that originally barred ICE agents from questioning and detaining individuals based on their presence at a particular location, the type of work they do, their race or ethnicity, and their accent while speaking English or Spanish; and a hospital seeks to limit OSHA's ability to cite employers for failing to halt workplace violence without a specific regulation in place.
September 9
Ninth Circuit revives Trader Joe’s lawsuit against employee union; new bill aims to make striking workers eligible for benefits; university lecturer who praised Hitler gets another chance at First Amendment claims.
September 8
DC Circuit to rule on deference to NLRB, more vaccine exemption cases, Senate considers ban on forced arbitration for age discrimination claims.
September 7
Another weak jobs report, the Trump Administration's refusal to arbitrate with federal workers, and a district court judge's order on the constitutionality of the Laken-Riley Act.