Rund Khayyat is a student at Harvard Law School.
As the Amazon labor union movement comes to a head in Alabama, the New Yorker published a column Thursday analyzing, what it describes, the “changing politics of labor.” The article notes that Amazon represents “an extreme expression of the twenty-first century’s extreme inequality and concentration of wealth and economic power, which has already changed the Democratic Party and some elements of the G.O.P.,” and has thus drawn together some unusual allies on both sides of the aisle.
In response to the Amazon union drive, the usual labor allies, such as Stacie Abrams, Bernie Sanders, and President Biden, have been extraordinarily outspoken. For example, Biden announced his support for the organizers and strongly warned employers not to interfere with the efforts – the last president to use such explicit language in support of unions was President Roosevelt.
At the same time, new prominent players on the right are denouncing Amazon’s business practices and supporting the labor efforts. Those on the center-right are not only concerned over Bezos’s “accelerating wealth and Amazon’s profiteering,” but also about the company’s interventions in politics, which tend to be interventions that align with the interests of Democrats (such as its decisions to stop hosting Parler, the extremist social-media site, on Amazon Web Services).
For example, conservative senator Marco Rubio (R-Fl.) notably published an op-ed in USA Today declaring his support for the workers, and both Tucker Carlson’s Fox News show, and conservative Senator Josh Hawley’s (R-Miss.) new book titled “The Tyranny of Big Tech,” have targeted Bezos’ practices.
Still, conservatives are still skeptical of labor unions, and so the outspoken language by Democrats is more significant to labor leaders than the newfound allies on the right. Still, because so many of Amazon’s practices and successes are rooted in its power over workers, conservatives who oppose Amazon must do more to support worker power.
Daily News & Commentary
Start your day with our roundup of the latest labor developments. See all
September 16
In today’s news and commentary, the NLRB sues New York, a flight attendant sues United, and the Third Circuit considers the employment status of Uber drivers The NLRB sued New York to block a new law that would grant the state authority over private-sector labor disputes. As reported on recently by Finlay, the law, which […]
September 15
Unemployment claims rise; a federal court hands victory to government employees union; and employers fire workers over social media posts.
September 14
Workers at Boeing reject the company’s third contract proposal; NLRB Acting General Counsel William Cohen plans to sue New York over the state’s trigger bill; Air Canada flight attendants reject a tentative contract.
September 12
Zohran Mamdani calls on FIFA to end dynamic pricing for the World Cup; the San Francisco Office of Labor Standards Enforcement opens a probe into Scale AI’s labor practices; and union members organize immigration defense trainings.
September 11
California rideshare deal advances; Boeing reaches tentative agreement with union; FTC scrutinizes healthcare noncompetes.
September 10
A federal judge denies a motion by the Trump Administration to dismiss a lawsuit led by the American Federation of Government Employees against President Trump for his mass layoffs of federal workers; the Supreme Court grants a stay on a federal district court order that originally barred ICE agents from questioning and detaining individuals based on their presence at a particular location, the type of work they do, their race or ethnicity, and their accent while speaking English or Spanish; and a hospital seeks to limit OSHA's ability to cite employers for failing to halt workplace violence without a specific regulation in place.