Tala Doumani is a student at Harvard Law School.
On Dec. 30, the Biden administration urged the Supreme Court to uphold its vaccine mandate for large employers to combat the continuing surge of COVID-19. In a brief responding to challengers seeking to block the rule, Solicitor General Elizabeth B. Prelogar wrote that the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 “unambiguously” grants the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) the authority to issue emergency temporary standards (ETS) when the agency determines that employees are in grave danger from exposure to physically harmful “agents” or “new hazards” such as COVID-19. Authority to promulgate such standards is without any exception for standards that might have large economic or political significance the brief asserts. Moreover, the brief argues, Congress specifically directed OSHA to use its existing regulatory authority to address workplace exposure to COVID-19.
Business coalitions and Republican-led states have challenged the rule as a vast overreach of executive powers and have asked the Supreme Court to keep it from going into effect. Challengers assert that OSHA lacks the regulatory power to promulgate such a sweeping mandate without a “clear statement” from Congress authorizing an ETS addressing widespread workplace exposure. Challengers also contend the mandate will result in irreparable harm from compliance costs and potential worker shortages.
Issued Nov. 5, the OSHA regulation requires businesses with 100 or more employees to adopt policies necessitating workers be vaccinated against COVID-19 or wear masks and regularly test. Employers who fail to comply may be subject to fines. The mandate is expected to affect over 84 million workers. OSHA estimates that the regulation will save over 6,500 worker lives and prevent over 250,000 hospitalizations during the first six months of its enactment.
While the mandate was set to take effect Jan. 4, OSHA stated it would not take any enforcement actions before Jan. 10 so companies would have more time to implement the requirements. Additionally, OSHA announced that it would not issue citations for failure to comply with the mandate until Feb. 9 provided that the employers were acting in good faith.
Previously, a three-judge panel of the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the OSHA standard in a 2-1 ruling, stating that the rule was “an important step in curtailing the transmission of a deadly virus that has killed over 800,000 people in the United States, brought our health care system to its knees, and cost hundreds of thousands of workers their jobs.”
The Supreme Court is scheduled to hear oral arguments for the case, National Federation of Independent Business v. OSHA, on Jan. 7.
Daily News & Commentary
Start your day with our roundup of the latest labor developments. See all
August 23
Hyundai Motors workers launch full-day strike; federal judge rules in favor of Vermont dairy plant in closure dispute
August 21
Tyson workers respond to abrupt plant shutdown; DOL ends its power to police federal contractor bias.
August 20
Unions sue the government over new visa rule; Judge declines to dismiss former Amazon worker's suit.
August 19
NLRB swears in third Trump-appointed Member; Teamster file complaint against Amazon in New York; unions and college students sue Trump admin for international student immigration restrictions
August 18
New Trump administration rules will remove the Merit Systems Protection Board's independence; a CFPB union leader suspended alleges retaliation; the National Treasury Employees Union requires its members to pay dues as it battles to stay financially afloat.
August 17
Tensions rise between New York City's teachers' union and City Hall; NLRB judge finds Brooklyn hospital violated labor law.