A district judge in the Northern District of California certified a class of Uber drivers in Dulberg v. Uber Technologies Inc. The breach of contract suit alleges that after the company implemented its upfront pricing feature, drivers were not paid adequate wages. Before upfront pricing, drivers were paid roughly 80% of the cost of a ride while Uber received the remaining 20%. According to the suit, under the new upfront pricing plan, passengers are charged a higher rate upfront, but Uber continued to pay drivers according to the pre-upfront pricing calculations. As a result, drivers received less than 80% of the total fare. According to the certification, the class includes drivers across the country who drove for UberSelect or UberX, and who drove passengers who were charged upfront fares prior to May 22, 2017, when updates to Uber’s driver fee schedule took effect. These drivers also must have made less money because of the new policy, and have opted out of Uber’s arbitration provision. There are approximately 4,600 drivers who could participate in the class action.
The New York Times chronicled how Medicaid’s lack of dental care coverage can lead not only to poorer overall health, but bleak employment and economic prospects. In addition to correlations with certain types of cancers, cardiovascular diseases, and increased risk of preterm delivery, poor dental health is also associated with negative social judgments and employment outcomes. As a number of states consider imposing work requirements for Medicaid eligibility, the connection between dental health and employment has become more important to examine. Approximately one-third of adults eligible for Medicaid in states that have adopted the Affordable Care Act Medicaid expansion (those living 138 percent below the poverty line) say that their teeth have impacted their ability to interview for jobs. One study found that people with poor dental health were perceived as less intelligent and less qualified for jobs. Currently, only 17 state Medicaid programs offer comprehensive dental benefits for adults.
Late last week, Austin’s City Council passed an ordinance requiring paid sick leave for all private employers in the city. All private employers, regardless of size, would have to provide leave for employees if they work for at least 80 hours annually. The ordinance provides for one hour of leave for every 30 hours worked. Leave can be used for the employee’s own illness, or to take care of family members, which includes spouses, children, parents, other blood relatives and others with whom the employee has the equivalent of a family relationship. Under the ordinance, employees must receive the same compensation they would have received if they were working. The ordinance will begin to take effect on October 1, 2018. Seven other states and the District of Columbia and 28 cities have paid sick leave legislation. Austin is the first southern city to institute paid sick leave.
Daily News & Commentary
Start your day with our roundup of the latest labor developments. See all
October 6
EEOC regains quorum; Second Circuit issues opinion on DEI causing hostile work environment.
October 5
In today’s news and commentary, HELP committee schedules a vote on Trump’s NLRB nominees, the 5th Circuit rejects Amazon’s request for en banc review, and TV production workers win their first union contract. After a nomination hearing on Wednesday, the Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee scheduled a committee vote on President Trump’s NLRB nominees […]
October 3
California legislation empowers state labor board; ChatGPT used in hostile workplace case; more lawsuits challenge ICE arrests
October 2
AFGE and AFSCME sue in response to the threat of mass firings; another preliminary injunction preventing Trump from stripping some federal workers of collective bargaining rights; and challenges to state laws banning captive audience meetings.
September 30
the NTEU petitions for reconsideration for the CFPB layoff scheme, an insurance company defeats a FLSA claim, and a construction company violated the NLRA by surveilling its unionized workers.
September 29
Starbucks announces layoffs and branch closures; the EEOC sues Walmart.