A district judge in the Northern District of California certified a class of Uber drivers in Dulberg v. Uber Technologies Inc. The breach of contract suit alleges that after the company implemented its upfront pricing feature, drivers were not paid adequate wages. Before upfront pricing, drivers were paid roughly 80% of the cost of a ride while Uber received the remaining 20%. According to the suit, under the new upfront pricing plan, passengers are charged a higher rate upfront, but Uber continued to pay drivers according to the pre-upfront pricing calculations. As a result, drivers received less than 80% of the total fare. According to the certification, the class includes drivers across the country who drove for UberSelect or UberX, and who drove passengers who were charged upfront fares prior to May 22, 2017, when updates to Uber’s driver fee schedule took effect. These drivers also must have made less money because of the new policy, and have opted out of Uber’s arbitration provision. There are approximately 4,600 drivers who could participate in the class action.
The New York Times chronicled how Medicaid’s lack of dental care coverage can lead not only to poorer overall health, but bleak employment and economic prospects. In addition to correlations with certain types of cancers, cardiovascular diseases, and increased risk of preterm delivery, poor dental health is also associated with negative social judgments and employment outcomes. As a number of states consider imposing work requirements for Medicaid eligibility, the connection between dental health and employment has become more important to examine. Approximately one-third of adults eligible for Medicaid in states that have adopted the Affordable Care Act Medicaid expansion (those living 138 percent below the poverty line) say that their teeth have impacted their ability to interview for jobs. One study found that people with poor dental health were perceived as less intelligent and less qualified for jobs. Currently, only 17 state Medicaid programs offer comprehensive dental benefits for adults.
Late last week, Austin’s City Council passed an ordinance requiring paid sick leave for all private employers in the city. All private employers, regardless of size, would have to provide leave for employees if they work for at least 80 hours annually. The ordinance provides for one hour of leave for every 30 hours worked. Leave can be used for the employee’s own illness, or to take care of family members, which includes spouses, children, parents, other blood relatives and others with whom the employee has the equivalent of a family relationship. Under the ordinance, employees must receive the same compensation they would have received if they were working. The ordinance will begin to take effect on October 1, 2018. Seven other states and the District of Columbia and 28 cities have paid sick leave legislation. Austin is the first southern city to institute paid sick leave.
Daily News & Commentary
Start your day with our roundup of the latest labor developments. See all
September 16
In today’s news and commentary, the NLRB sues New York, a flight attendant sues United, and the Third Circuit considers the employment status of Uber drivers The NLRB sued New York to block a new law that would grant the state authority over private-sector labor disputes. As reported on recently by Finlay, the law, which […]
September 15
Unemployment claims rise; a federal court hands victory to government employees union; and employers fire workers over social media posts.
September 14
Workers at Boeing reject the company’s third contract proposal; NLRB Acting General Counsel William Cohen plans to sue New York over the state’s trigger bill; Air Canada flight attendants reject a tentative contract.
September 12
Zohran Mamdani calls on FIFA to end dynamic pricing for the World Cup; the San Francisco Office of Labor Standards Enforcement opens a probe into Scale AI’s labor practices; and union members organize immigration defense trainings.
September 11
California rideshare deal advances; Boeing reaches tentative agreement with union; FTC scrutinizes healthcare noncompetes.
September 10
A federal judge denies a motion by the Trump Administration to dismiss a lawsuit led by the American Federation of Government Employees against President Trump for his mass layoffs of federal workers; the Supreme Court grants a stay on a federal district court order that originally barred ICE agents from questioning and detaining individuals based on their presence at a particular location, the type of work they do, their race or ethnicity, and their accent while speaking English or Spanish; and a hospital seeks to limit OSHA's ability to cite employers for failing to halt workplace violence without a specific regulation in place.