Hannah Finnie is a writer in Washington, D.C. interested in the intersections of work and culture. She is a graduate of Harvard Law School.
The Supreme Court will hear fast-tracked oral arguments today in a consolidated set of cases challenging the Biden administration’s OSHA Emergency Temporary Standard (ETS) protecting workers against contracting COVID-19 at work and challenging a similar mandate from the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).
The OSHA ETS requires companies with 100 or more employees to have employees either get vaccinated against COVID-19 or be subject to testing once a week and wear a mask at work. OSHA is empowered to create emergency temporary standards that can function for six months without going through the usual notice and comment rulemaking process “when it determines that a rule is ‘necessary’ to protect employees from a ‘grave danger’ from exposure to ‘physically harmful’ ‘agents’ or ‘new hazard,’” according to SCOTUSblog. Applying this standard to COVID-19, OSHA determined that COVID-19 fit the bill of being both physically harmful and a new hazard, and posed grave danger to unvaccinated workers. This rule was challenged by 27 states (led by Ohio) and the National Federation of Independent Business, which also led a challenge to the ACA in National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius.
The second Biden administration COVID-19 rule the Supreme Court will hear a challenge to is an HHS rule requiring health care workers at facilities participating in federal Medicare or Medicaid programs to get vaccinated, with the possibility of a medical or religious exemption.
Taken together, these two rules have the possibility of affecting the conditions of millions of workers. The OSHA ETS covers around two-thirds of the private sector and the HHS rule covers approximately 10 million workers (though some workers could be covered by both rules). The Supreme Court will be deciding whether the rules can stay in place while challenges make their way up through the courts. As a Washington Post article noted, the Supreme Court itself has stricter COVID-19 protocols than the OSHA rule requirements.
In other news, Student Workers of Columbia, a union of instructors, researchers, and teaching assistants at Columbia University, announced late last night it had reached a tentative agreement for its first contract with the school. The union and the school had been bargaining for three years, and the union went on a 10-week strike in the process of reaching this agreement.
In addition, Comic Book Workers United declared victory in its union election last night, which it says makes it the first unionized comic book publisher in the U.S.
Daily News & Commentary
Start your day with our roundup of the latest labor developments. See all
August 29
Trump fires regulator in charge of reviewing railroad mergers; fired Fed Governor sues Trump asserting unlawful termination; and Trump attacks more federal sector unions.
August 28
contested election for UAW at Kentucky battery plant; NLRB down to one member; public approval of unions remains high.
August 27
The U.S. Department of Justice welcomes new hires and forces reassignments in the Civil Rights Division; the Ninth Circuit hears oral arguments in Brown v. Alaska Airlines Inc.; and Amazon violates federal labor law at its air cargo facility in Kentucky.
August 26
Park employees at Yosemite vote to unionize; Philadelphia teachers reach tentative three-year agreement; a new report finds California’s union coverage remains steady even as national union density declines.
August 25
Consequences of SpaceX decision, AI may undermine white-collar overtime exemptions, Sixth Circuit heightens standard for client harassment.
August 24
HHS cancels union contracts, the California Supreme Court rules on minimum wage violations, and jobless claims rise