Andrew Strom is a union lawyer based in New York City. He is also an adjunct professor at Brooklyn Law School.
Among the scariest images of Hurricane Irma were two collapsed cranes at construction sites in Miami. If you’re wondering why Miami doesn’t have stricter laws regulating construction cranes, the answer is that when Miami enacted a law requiring cranes to withstand 140 mile per hour winds, the Associated Builders and Contractors, an association of non-union construction companies sued and stopped the law from going into effect.
Most cranes in the United States are only built to withstand winds of 93 miles per hour. But, in 2008, Miami-Dade County wisely realized that in a hurricane-prone region, it would make sense to impose stricter standards. The County decided that tower cranes should withstand wind loads of 140 miles per hour. Instead of accepting the wind load standard, the Associated Builders and Contractors sued, arguing that the federal Occupational Safety and Health Act preempted the local ordinance. The County argued that even if local workplace health and safety laws are ordinarily preempted, these standards should not be because “failing cranes kill people, workers and non-workers alike.” The County argued that particularly during hurricanes, the new standard was directed at public safety, not occupational safety.
But, the three judge panel on the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals rejected the County’s argument. The judges pointed out that construction sites are typically closed to the public, and “the County failed to identify a single incident in which a crane accident injured a member of the general public during a hurricane.” In other words, instead of taking precautionary measures, the County should have waited for someone to die, and then, perhaps the regulation would pass muster. I’d like to think the Eleventh Circuit judges are having second thoughts about that opinion.
Daily News & Commentary
Start your day with our roundup of the latest labor developments. See all
November 6
Starbucks workers authorize a strike; Sixth Circuit rejects Thryv remedies; OPEIU tries to intervene to defend the NLRB.
November 5
Denver Labor helps workers recover over $2.3 million in unpaid wages; the Eighth Circuit denies a request for an en ban hearing on Minnesota’s ban on captive audience meetings; and many top labor unions break from AFGE’s support for a Republican-backed government funding bill.
November 4
Second Circuit declines to revive musician’s defamation claims against former student; Trump administration adds new eligibility requirements for employers under the Public Service Loan Forgiveness program; major labor unions break with the AFGE's stance on the government shutdown.
November 3
Fifth Circuit rejects Thryv remedies, Third Circuit considers applying Ames to NJ statute, and some circuits relax McDonnell Douglas framework.
November 2
In today’s news and commentary, states tackle “stay-or-pay” contracts, a new preliminary injunction bars additional shutdown layoffs, and two federal judges order the Trump administration to fund SNAP. Earlier this year, NLRB acting general counsel William Cowen rescinded a 2024 NLRB memo targeting “stay-or-pay” contracts. Former General Counsel Jennifer Abruzzo had declared that these kinds […]
October 31
DHS ends work permit renewal grace period; Starbucks strike authorization vote; captive-audience ban case appeal