
Holden Hopkins is a student at Harvard Law School.
In today’s News & Commentary, another store of unionized Apple Store workers reaches a deal, NLRB finds unfair labor practice over Starbucks subpoenas, and New York Governor Hochul signs a workplace violence prevention bill into law.
Gil reported in July that the first unionized Apple Store (in Towson, Maryland) had reached a contract with their employer. Now, a second store has achieved a collective bargaining agreement. Workers at the Oklahoma City store announced the deal on Friday, averting a potential strike. The CBA is similar to the one achieved by Maryland Apple Store employees, with an 11.5% wage increase over three years, along with “more involvement in the scheduling process, a grievance and arbitration process to settle disputes, paid time off, health benefits, and job protections if stores close.” The Oklahoma workers are organized through the CWA.
While this marks a promising step forward for these workers, the broader push to unionize more Apple Stores has faced headwinds. With more than three hundred locations nationwide, workers have struggled to gain traction so far outside of a handful of stores. At issue in organizing these stores is employer pushback and what organizers call a “difficult organizing environment,” with many employees being long-tenured and having strong ties to the Apple brand.
The National Labor Relations Board ruled on Friday that Starbucks had violated labor law when it subpoenaed worker testimony presented to the Board. This ruling upheld an administrative law judge’s initial holding from last year that such actions violate Section 7 by “restrain[ing] the workers’ ability to organize and participate in the board’s litigation.”
The testimony at issue had been given by two Starbucks baristas at a La Quinta, California cafe in confidential witness affidavits submitted to the Regional Office. Starbucks sought these documents as well as journals and recordings made by organizers during the union drive at the store as a part of a separate unfair labor practice case. The Board ordered Starbucks to cease its unlawful behavior.
And on Thursday, New York Governor Kathy Hochul signed the Retail Worker Safety Act into law. This measure requires retail employers to develop workplace violence prevention plans. Bloomberg Law described it as “one of the most expansive workplace violence laws for retailers in the country,” and many of the law’s provisions apply to employers with as few as ten employees. Under the law, retailers will have to train their employees in conflict de-escalation and how to respond to gun violence, as well as requiring “panic buttons” at large employers for employees to quickly contact law enforcement in the event of an emergency.
This is the latest in state legislative action on workplace safety—California passed a similar law with applicability across more sectors which went into effect on July 1 of this year. The New York law will take effect on January 1, 2025.
Daily News & Commentary
Start your day with our roundup of the latest labor developments. See all
July 1
In today’s news and commentary, the Department of Labor proposes to roll back minimum wage and overtime protections for home care workers, a federal judge dismissed a lawsuit by public defenders over a union’s Gaza statements, and Philadelphia’s largest municipal union is on strike for first time in nearly 40 years. On Monday, the U.S. […]
June 30
Antidiscrimination scholars question McDonnell Douglas, George Washington University Hospital bargained in bad faith, and NY regulators defend LPA dispensary law.
June 29
In today’s news and commentary, Trump v. CASA restricts nationwide injunctions, a preliminary injunction continues to stop DOL from shutting down Job Corps, and the minimum wage is set to rise in multiple cities and states. On Friday, the Supreme Court held in Trump v. CASA that universal injunctions “likely exceed the equitable authority that […]
June 27
Labor's role in Zohran Mamdani's victory; DHS funding amendment aims to expand guest worker programs; COSELL submission deadline rapidly approaching
June 26
A district judge issues a preliminary injunction blocking agencies from implementing Trump’s executive order eliminating collective bargaining for federal workers; workers organize for the reinstatement of two doctors who were put on administrative leave after union activity; and Lamont vetoes unemployment benefits for striking workers.
June 25
Some circuits show less deference to NLRB; 3d Cir. affirms return to broader concerted activity definition; changes to federal workforce excluded from One Big Beautiful Bill.