Linh is a student at Harvard Law School.
Over 75,000 Kaiser Permanente workers began the largest healthcare strike in U.S. history on Wednesday morning at 6am E.T., starting in Virginia, Maryland, and Washington D.C. Workers in Colorado, California, Oregon, and Washington soon followed. This is the largest U.S. health care strike to date, threatening to interrupt one of the nation’s largest health-care providers and adding to a months-long series of labor disruptions across the national economy. The strike is a culmination of tension between health-care companies and their workers since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, when––as the Coalition of Kaiser Permanente unions claim––Kaiser created an understaffed, burned-out workforce incapable of looking after patients. Negotiations continue to be under way, but federal law requires that healthcare union members return to the job even if no deal is reached by Oct. 7.
On Wednesday, Trader Joe’s United filed an unfair labor practice charge against Trader Joe’s and its law firm, O’Melveny & Myers LLP, alleging that the company had lodged a “frivolous” trademark lawsuit against the union in July as retaliation for protected activity. In that July lawsuit, Trader Joe’s accused the Union of using the company logo on merchandise in violation of trademark laws. Besides the ULP charge, Trader Joe’s United also sent a letter to an O’Melveny & Myers partner, labeling the copyright suit a “calculated nefarious legal scheme” to “punish essential workers who are exercising their legally-protected right to form a union.”
A U.S. citizen denied a job at Meta Platforms Inc. sued the company for citizenship discrimination, alleging that it favors foreign workers on H1B visas over U.S. citizens. On Wednesday, a Ninth Circuit panel heard arguments in this case, testing the limits of Section 1981 of the 1866 Civil Rights Act. Before getting to the Ninth Circuit, the case was dismissed for lack of standing, as the magistrate judge found that such reverse discrimination claims weren’t covered by the statute.
Daily News & Commentary
Start your day with our roundup of the latest labor developments. See all
June 22
California lawmakers challenge Garmon preemption in the absence of an NLRB quorum and Utah organizers successfully secure a ballot referendum to overturn HB 267.
June 20
Three state bills challenge Garmon preemption; Wisconsin passes a bill establishing portable benefits for gig workers; and a sharp increase in workplace ICE raids contribute to a nationwide labor shortage.
June 19
Report finds retaliatory action by UAW President; Senators question Trump's EEOC pick; California considers new bill to address federal labor law failures.
June 18
Companies dispute NLRB regional directors' authority to make rulings while the Board lacks a quorum; the Department of Justice loses 4,500 employees to the Trump Administration's buyout offers; and a judge dismisses Columbia faculty's lawsuit over the institution's funding cuts.
June 17
NLRB finds a reporter's online criticism of the Washington Post was not protected activity under federal labor law; top union leaders leave the Democratic National Committee amid internal strife; Uber reaches a labor peace agreement with Chicago drivers.
June 16
California considers bill requiring human operators inside autonomous delivery vehicles; Eighth Circuit considers challenge to Minnesota misclassification law and whether "having a family to support" is a gendered comment.