Divya Nimmagadda is a student at Harvard Law School.
A recent piece in the American Prospect by Professors Sharon Block and Benjamin Sachs analyzes the connection between party affiliation and support for workers and labor by comparing the state-level labor policies of red and blue states. Among the red states, you see concerted efforts to interfere with the UAW’s organizing campaign in the South, policies that hinder the ability of public sector unions to collect dues, and legislation that disincentivizes card check agreements. In contrast, in the blue states, the policies have been more focused on expanding worker and union rights, with legislation aimed at banning captive audience meetings, expanding bargaining subjects for teachers, enabling worker voice in discussions around labor standards, and expanding labor protections for worker groups excluded from the NLRA. Among the key takeaways is that “[s]o long as states remain under partisan control, the outlook for workers is in many ways determined by whether a Democrat or a Republican sits in their governor’s mansions.” However, with the upcoming Election Day, there is an opportunity for democratic voters to enable more pro-labor policies through the ballot initiative processes in the red states.
The National Labor Relations Board has reported that, during President Biden’s administration, there has been a “doubling of petitions by workers to have union representation.” Compared to the 1,638 representation petitions filed in 2021, there were 3,286 in 2024. In a stark contrast, union petitions declined by 22% in the course of President Trump’s presidency. Relatedly, there has also been a marked increase in the filing of unfair labor practice complaints. The NLRB reported that its field offices received a total of 24,578 in the last year, which has been “the most in more than a decade.” The NLRB’s General Counsel, Jennifer Abruzzo, commented that the increase was a result of workers “knowing and exercising their rights.” However, she also noted the relative lack of resources at the agency and urged “Congress to fully fund the NLRB so that employers, unions and workers receive prompt and meaningful case resolutions.” The NLRB had a similar case load back in 2011, but back then, it also had “62% more field staff.”
The President used the opportunity to remark on his administration’s pro-worker policies and posture, stating “after the previous administration sided with big corporations to undermine workers — from blocking overtime pay protections to making it harder to organize — my Administration has supported workers.” His administration is the first in more than five decades to see an uptick in election petitions. However, though union membership is growing, it has not outpaced the rate of job growth, meaning the share of the workforce that belongs to a union has decreased.
Daily News & Commentary
Start your day with our roundup of the latest labor developments. See all
September 10
A federal judge denies a motion by the Trump Administration to dismiss a lawsuit led by the American Federation of Government Employees against President Trump for his mass layoffs of federal workers; the Supreme Court grants a stay on a federal district court order that originally barred ICE agents from questioning and detaining individuals based on their presence at a particular location, the type of work they do, their race or ethnicity, and their accent while speaking English or Spanish; and a hospital seeks to limit OSHA's ability to cite employers for failing to halt workplace violence without a specific regulation in place.
September 9
Ninth Circuit revives Trader Joe’s lawsuit against employee union; new bill aims to make striking workers eligible for benefits; university lecturer who praised Hitler gets another chance at First Amendment claims.
September 8
DC Circuit to rule on deference to NLRB, more vaccine exemption cases, Senate considers ban on forced arbitration for age discrimination claims.
September 7
Another weak jobs report, the Trump Administration's refusal to arbitrate with federal workers, and a district court judge's order on the constitutionality of the Laken-Riley Act.
September 5
Pro-labor legislation in New Jersey; class action lawsuit by TN workers proceeds; a report about wage theft in D.C.
September 4
Eighth Circuit avoids a challenge to Minnesota’s ban on captive audience meetings; ALJ finds that Starbucks violated the NLRA again; and a district court certifies a class of behavioral health workers pursuing wage claims.