Jon Weinberg is a student at Harvard Law School.
Today, the National Labor Relations Board ruled in the long-awaited Browning-Ferris Industries of California case that companies can be held responsible for labor violations committed by their contractors. The decision can be found here.
According to The New York Times, the ruling means that “a company that hires a contractor to staff its facilities may be considered a so-called joint employer of the workers at that facility, even if it does not actively supervise them.” As a result, “a union representing those workers would now be legally entitled to bargain with the upstream company, not just the contractor, under federal labor law.” The decision opens the door to collective bargaining between workers and franchisors, such as McDonald’s, and may radically change how companies use contracted labor.
Daily News & Commentary
Start your day with our roundup of the latest labor developments. See all
August 7
Starbucks beats claims it denied shifts to union workers; Center for State Labor Innovation aims to address labor law shortcomings.
August 6
Taylor Farms faces scrutiny over labor practices; Bipartisan labor bill gains momentum.
August 5
Clash over potential change to Canada’s labor code; Harvard’s Center for Labor and a Just Economy releases model sectoral bargaining laws; NJ sues Amazon for antitrust violations.
August 4
WestJet reaches a deal to end a flight attendant strike; the NLRB rules Whole Foods legally banned Black Lives Matter display; a commentary argues college athletes should have the right to collectively bargain.
August 3
Queens College faculty stage protest; UAW holds presidential debate; the Protect College Sports Act gets new life.
August 2
WestJet flight attendants go on strike, and the American Federation of Government Employees challenges another VA attempt to terminate its collective bargaining agreement.