Linh is a student at Harvard Law School.
On Wednesday, the Eleventh Circuit significantly restored the NLRB’s power to stop unlawful litigation by vacating a Trump-era Board ruling. Prior to 2019, the NLRB enjoyed wide authority to block litigation if the result sought by the litigant would violate federal labor law. In 2019, however, when Anheuser-Busch filed a motion to compel arbitration in a former union employee’s racial discrimination lawsuit even when the company’s arbitration program didn’t apply to union workers, the Board allowed the employer’s filing to go forward. Finding that the motion did not have illegal aims, the Board advanced a novel theory that there must be an additional illegal underlying act, beyond the filing in question, before the Board can halt the employer’s litigation. The Eleventh Circuit vacated this problematic ruling on Wednesday, criticizing it as “eviscerat[ing]” the NLRB’s ability to stop litigation without giving a “hint” of what kind of action would qualify under its novel rule. The result, the Court said, was essentially to allow all litigation, even those with unlawful objectives, to go forward. The case has been sent back to the Board to determine whether Anheuser-Busch’s motion to compel arbitration can now be blocked.
An NLRB ALJ ruled on Wednesday that Fred Meyer had engaged in unlawful discrimination on the basis of political beliefs when they sent home certain employees wearing “Black Lives Matter” apparel and instructed the rest of the employees that such apparel was prohibited. Administrative Law Judge Mara-Louise Anzalone concluded that the Fred Meyer employees had acted in a concerted manner by organizing “listening sessions” on the topic of racism following the killing of George Floyd in 2020 and sharing apparel with one another. The employer was ordered by the Board to stop enforcing its dress code policy related to Black Lives Matter apparel.
Workers at the first unionized Apple store in suburban Baltimore are negotiating to demand higher pay, better benefits, and other business practices that have the potential to impact the company’s historically tightly-controlled retail experience. Represented by the International Association of Machinists & Aerospace Workers, these employees are set to attend bargaining sessions with Apple on May 3 and 4, 2023. Among the proposals are 10% wage increases, changes to overtime and vacation policy, and a tipping system that would let customers offer gratuities to employees.
Daily News & Commentary
Start your day with our roundup of the latest labor developments. See all
July 2
Block, Nanda, and Nayak argue that the NLRA is under attack, harming democracy; the EEOC files a motion to dismiss a lawsuit brought by former EEOC Commissioner Jocelyn Samuels; and SEIU Local 1000 strikes an agreement with the State of California to delay the state's return-to-office executive order for state workers.
July 1
In today’s news and commentary, the Department of Labor proposes to roll back minimum wage and overtime protections for home care workers, a federal judge dismissed a lawsuit by public defenders over a union’s Gaza statements, and Philadelphia’s largest municipal union is on strike for first time in nearly 40 years. On Monday, the U.S. […]
June 30
Antidiscrimination scholars question McDonnell Douglas, George Washington University Hospital bargained in bad faith, and NY regulators defend LPA dispensary law.
June 29
In today’s news and commentary, Trump v. CASA restricts nationwide injunctions, a preliminary injunction continues to stop DOL from shutting down Job Corps, and the minimum wage is set to rise in multiple cities and states. On Friday, the Supreme Court held in Trump v. CASA that universal injunctions “likely exceed the equitable authority that […]
June 27
Labor's role in Zohran Mamdani's victory; DHS funding amendment aims to expand guest worker programs; COSELL submission deadline rapidly approaching
June 26
A district judge issues a preliminary injunction blocking agencies from implementing Trump’s executive order eliminating collective bargaining for federal workers; workers organize for the reinstatement of two doctors who were put on administrative leave after union activity; and Lamont vetoes unemployment benefits for striking workers.