Gurtaran Johal is a student at Harvard Law School.
In today’s news and commentary, two federal agencies violate a federal court order that paused the mass layoffs of federal workers; Walmart terminates some jobs in Florida following Supreme Court rulings on the legal status of migrants; and Los Angeles firefighters receive a $9.5 million settlement from a federal court case arguing that the city did not pay firefighters during shift changes.
Bloomberg Law reports that the U.S. State Department and the Department of Housing and Urban Development, as the American Federation of Government Employees and other unions contend, have continued to participate in the mass layoffs of federal employees, despite a federal court order halting President Trump’s executive order to implement these drastic layoffs. The unions filed an urgent request for a status conference before Judge Susan Illston of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California to resolve the dispute. Judge Illston had previously issued a preliminary injunction prohibiting federal agencies from engaging with these mass firings. Counsel for the government argues that the agencies’ conduct does not violate the preliminary injunction because they took action following a directive from Secretary of State Marco Rubio, not in response to the executive order. The unions have requested that the status conference occur by the end of the week.
Meanwhile, Walmart Inc. notified migrant workers in at least two stores in Florida that they would lose their positions without proper work authorization. This move comes after the Supreme Court ruling that ended Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for 350,000 Venezuelans migrants. TPS formerly allowed these migrants to legally work in the United States. Walt Disney Co. also notified Florida-based employees without legal residency that they would lose their positions. These job cuts are a potential indicator of the future challenges that migrant workers will face under the Trump Administration.
Lastly, Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes of the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California approved a $9.5 million settlement for firefighters in Los Angeles who argued that they were not paid in full for up to an hour and a half of work during shift changes. Specifically, due to staffing shortages, firefighters often worked beyond their shift. The settlement agreement includes $2.3 million in attorneys’ fees and $16,000 in litigation costs for the plaintiffs. This approval comes approximately a month after the city of Los Angeles and the firefighters initially reached the $9.5 million settlement.
Daily News & Commentary
Start your day with our roundup of the latest labor developments. See all
January 30
Multiple unions endorse a national general strike, and tech companies spend millions on ad campaigns for data centers.
January 29
Texas pauses H-1B hiring; NLRB General Counsel announces new procedures and priorities; Fourth Circuit rejects a teacher's challenge to pronoun policies.
January 28
Over 15,000 New York City nurses continue to strike with support from Mayor Mamdani; a judge grants a preliminary injunction that prevents DHS from ending family reunification parole programs for thousands of family members of U.S. citizens and green-card holders; and decisions in SDNY address whether employees may receive accommodations for telework due to potential exposure to COVID-19 when essential functions cannot be completed at home.
January 27
NYC's new delivery-app tipping law takes effect; 31,000 Kaiser Permanente nurses and healthcare workers go on strike; the NJ Appellate Division revives Atlantic City casino workers’ lawsuit challenging the state’s casino smoking exemption.
January 26
Unions mourn Alex Pretti, EEOC concentrates power, courts decide reach of EFAA.
January 25
Uber and Lyft face class actions against “women preference” matching, Virginia home healthcare workers push for a collective bargaining bill, and the NLRB launches a new intake protocol.