Anjali Katta is a student at Harvard Law School.
In today’s news and commentary, a pension fund wins at the Eleventh Circuit, casino unionization in Las Vegas, and DOL’s work-from-home policy changes.
A pension fund for unionized retail and grocery workers won an Eleventh Circuit appeal against Perfection Bakeries, which claimed it was overcharged nearly $2 million in federal withdrawal liability. The bakery argued the fund miscalculated its liability by going out of order when applying various statutory adjustments to the amount owed as outlined in ERISA. In a split decision, Judge Kevin Newsom, writing for the majority, ruled that ERISA supports applying such credits earlier in the four-step process, as the fund had done, and rejected the bakery’s interpretation. The decision aligns with the Ninth Circuit’s ruling and the only other appellate ruling addressing the issue when to apply statutory adjustments to withdrawal liability. Judge Andrew Brasher dissented, criticizing the fund for initially using a different method for calculating liability and only switching their methods after the Ninth Circuit’s 2018 decision.
For the first time in its 90-year history, the Culinary Workers Union, an affiliate of UNITE HERE, represents workers at all major casinos in the Las Vegas Strip. This record breaking achievement was secured by recent contracts signed between management and workers at the Venetian and Fontainebleau casinos. The union, which represents over 60,000 workers, won five-year contracts with pay increases of up to 32%, improved workplace conditions, improved pensions, health insurance, and other benefits. The increase in unionization on the Strip, which stands in sharp contrast to national trends, was not without difficulty. For example, some workers accused the union of deducting dues despite their objections to union membership. However, for many workers, the stability provided by a union in a transient industry allowed the union to prevail and gain popularity—on average at each casino, between 95-98% of workers opted into union membership.
The U.S. Labor Department is easing its return-to-office policy, allowing more flexible ‘situational’ telework for staff attending medical appointments, traveling, or those who are mildly ill but able to work. An internal memo circulated by the DOL’s assistant secretary for administration and management clarified that subagency leaders within the DOL can approve such informal telework arrangements to maintain workflow. Previously, telework was limited to emergencies or special cases. The shift in policy comes despite President Trump’s Executive Order to end remote work and send federal workers back to their offices for in-person work. The DOL has not commented on the memo.
Daily News & Commentary
Start your day with our roundup of the latest labor developments. See all
December 7
Philadelphia transit workers indicate that a strike is imminent; a federal judge temporarily blocks State Department layoffs; and Virginia lawmakers consider legislation to repeal the state’s “right to work” law.
December 5
Netflix set to acquire Warner Bros., Gen Z men are the most pro-union generation in history, and lawmakers introduce the “No Robot Bosses Act.”
December 4
Unionized journalists win arbitration concerning AI, Starbucks challenges two NLRB rulings in the Fifth Circuit, and Philadelphia transit workers resume contract negotiations.
December 3
The Trump administration seeks to appeal a federal judge’s order that protects the CBAs of employees within the federal workforce; the U.S. Department of Labor launches an initiative to investigate violations of the H-1B visa program; and a union files a petition to form a bargaining unit for employees at the Met.
December 2
Fourth Circuit rejects broad reading of NLRA’s managerial exception; OPM cancels reduced tuition program for federal employees; Starbucks will pay $39 million for violating New York City’s Fair Workweek law; Mamdani and Sanders join striking baristas outside a Brooklyn Starbucks.
December 1
California farmworkers defend state labor law, cities consider requiring companies to hire delivery drivers, Supreme Court takes FAA last-mile drivers case.