
Mila Rostain is a student at Harvard Law School.
In today’s News and Commentary, the Chicago Teachers Union (CTU) reaches a tentative agreement on a four-year contract, the Service Employees International Union (SEIU) holds rallies and brief work stoppages in major cities after the detention of SEIU members, and Representatives Golden and Fitzpatrick introduce legislation nullifying President Trump’s executive order.
On April 1st, CTU reached a tentative agreement on a four-year contract with the Chicago Public Schools (CPS). The agreement includes average raises of 23% for teachers, including cost of living adjustments over the life of the contract. The agreement creates 90 new librarian positions and is expected to yield 400 new teacher assistant positions through improved staffing ratios. The agreement also cements sanctuary protections, gives employees leave for immigration matters, and guarantees the right to abortion coverage. In addition to terms directly impacting bargaining unit members, the agreement also includes $10 million for busses and uniforms primarily reserved for schools serving mainly low-income students. Both CTU and CPS lauded the agreement. Of the contract, CTU president Stacy Davis said, “our young people win, the people who provide their education win, the families that send them to the Chicago Public Schools win, principals win, the Board of Education wins, the CEO wins, the mayor of Chicago wins.” After passing the CTU’s House of Delegates yesterday, the contract will head to a ratification vote.
Following the detention of SEIU members Rumeysa Ozturk and Lewellyn Dixon, SEIU held rallies in more than a dozen cities calling for the protection of first amendment rights. Starbucks workers, members of Starbucks Workers United, engaged in work stoppages at locations from Iowa City to Oklahoma City in support of the day of action. In a press statement last week, April Verrett, president of SEIU, demanded that the Trump administration “respect due process, transparency, free speech, and basic decency when it wields its vast immigration powers.”
In response to President Trump’s executive order seeking to end collective bargaining for federal labor unions in agencies with national security missions, Representatives Jared Golden and Brian Fitzpatrick introduced bipartisan legislation that would overturn the order. The order impacted around 67% of the federal workforce. According to Rep. Fitzpatrick, the Protect America’s Workforce Act “restores a balanced, targeted approach—protecting bargaining rights where they pose no threat to national security and reinforcing their proven role in supporting morale, accountability, and effective governance.” Unions including AFGE, AFSCME, and SEIU all support the Act.
Daily News & Commentary
Start your day with our roundup of the latest labor developments. See all
April 22
DOGE staffers eye NLRB for potential reorganization; attacks on federal workforce impact Trump-supporting areas; Utah governor acknowledges backlash to public-sector union ban
April 21
Bryan Johnson’s ULP saga before the NLRB continues; top law firms opt to appease the EEOC in its anti-DEI demands.
April 20
In today’s news and commentary, the Supreme Court rules for Cornell employees in an ERISA suit, the Sixth Circuit addresses whether the EFAA applies to a sexual harassment claim, and DOGE gains access to sensitive labor data on immigrants. On Thursday, the Supreme Court made it easier for employees to bring ERISA suits when their […]
April 18
Two major New York City unions endorse Cuomo for mayor; Committee on Education and the Workforce requests an investigation into a major healthcare union’s spending; Unions launch a national pro bono legal network for federal workers.
April 17
Utahns sign a petition supporting referendum to repeal law prohibiting public sector collective bargaining; the US District Court for the District of Columbia declines to dismiss claims filed by the AFL-CIO against several government agencies; and the DOGE faces reports that staffers of the agency accessed the NLRB’s sensitive case files.
April 16
7th Circuit questions the relevance of NLRB precedent after Loper Bright, unions seek to defend silica rule, and Abrego Garcia's union speaks out.