![](https://onlabor.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/Image.jpeg)
Sharon Block is a Professor of Practice and the Executive Director of the Center for Labor and a Just Economy at Harvard Law School.
To start, I completely agree with everything Ben wrote about the need for the NLRB to withdraw the Hy-Brand decision because of Member Bill Emanuel’s improper participation in the decisionmaking process. My only departure is that I don’t think Ben’s call for action goes far enough.
The Board should not only take Ben’s advice to invalidate the Hy-Brand decision, but should rethink the process it used that resulted in the problematic decision. If the Board decides to do a “do-over” on Hy-Brand they should fix not only Emanuel’s participation but also reverse the breach of Board precedent in deciding such a significant decision without any input from the public. The “mistake” of allowing Emanuel to improperly participate was just one symptom of the disease of their rush to change the joint employer law. As I noted in a post shortly after Hy-Brand issued, the dissent in Hy-Brand questioned whether the process was so deficient as to violate the Administrative Procedures Act – that was before the question of Emanuel’s recusal had been raised. This time around the Board should take the time to do it right – invite amicus briefs and maybe even hold hearing.
The Board has been subjected to unprecedented political attacks over the past 10 years, with accompanying attacks on its credibility as a fair arbiter of the law. The December cases that issued as former Chair Phil Miscamarra was leaving added to the perception that political considerations have undue influence on the Board’s decisionmaking process. The “flagrant problem” described by the IG in his report on Hy-Brand feeds that narrative. The question of the standard for deciding joint employment status is one of the most important labor questions today. Thus, that the Board’s process deciding this issue has been called into question is especially problematic. The Board has an opportunity, however, to stem the damage by slowing down and taking the time to engage in an open and transparent process to issue a new decision in Hy-Brand.
Daily News & Commentary
Start your day with our roundup of the latest labor developments. See all
July 5
A Los Angeles city councilor introduces a proposal to expand fair scheduling practices to fast food workers; contract negotiations between SAG-AFTRA and video game companies struggle on AI; Greece allows for a six-day work week.
July 4
Texas judge halts FTC ban on noncompetes; Biden Administration releases proposed rule protecting workers from excessive heat; California grocery workers ratify new labor contract after authorizing strike.
July 2
University of California strikes end while legal dispute continues; Disneyland workers raise awareness with park visitors; bus workers in Alabama set example for labor policy
July 1
Labor law impacts of Loper Bright and Jarkesy rulings; Unions push for workforce board represntation.
June 30
Explaining the turnaround in Starbucks-union negotiations; overtime rule implementation against Texas enjoined; California reforms PAGA
June 28
Gig driver classification deal reached in Massachusetts; Amazon drivers in Illinois strike over ULP; CEO pay accelerates.