Otto Barenberg is a student at Harvard Law School and the Digital Director of OnLabor.
In today’s news and commentary, Washington moves closer to banning captive audience meetings and Subway employees strike over workplace violence.
On Thursday, Washington legislators passed a bill (SB 5778) banning captive audience meetings. Governor Jay Inslee (D) has voiced his support for the measure, which, if signed into law, would make Washington the sixth state with a captive audience ban after Oregon, Connecticut, Maine, Minnesota, and New York. At the federal level, although National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) General Counsel Jennifer Abruzzo contends captive audience meetings are inherently coercive and violate national labor law, the Board has not yet issued a ruling on the issue.
Worker advocates and unions celebrated the Washington bill’s passage, saying that a ban on mandatory anti-union meetings would deprive companies of a powerful weapon in their union-busting arsenals. Rick Hicks, Teamsters Western Region International Vice President and President of Teamsters Joint Council 28, commented: “Unions are fundamentally about economic democracy, which is why we need to make the process of organizing as democratic as possible by putting an end to this autocratic practice.” However, business groups have brought litigation challenging bans on captive audience meetings in Minnesota and Connecticut, arguing that they constitute “viewpoint-based discrimination” and are preempted by the National Labor Relations Act. Supporters counter that the bans leave employers free to express their views on unions and prohibit only a requirement that workers listen as a condition of their employment.
On Friday, employees at a Subway in western Los Angeles launched a three-day strike in response to a wave of violence at their sandwich shop. Workers described harrowing interactions with customers, including one man who yelled expletives at employees while brandishing a machete. “The feeling that we were alone and that our management would not help us was disheartening,” Subway employee Sabina Gutierrez told the Los Angeles Daily News. She and other Subway employees are demanding the company provide de-escalation trainings, health care for workers subjected to workplace violence, and heightened security. Workers are also pushing Los Angeles to enact a Fast Food Fair Work ordinance requiring “know your rights” trainings, as well as paid time off and fair scheduling practices. The strike marks an early test for the California Fast Food Workers Union (CFFWU), the new Service Employees International Union (SEIU)-backed representative of the western Los Angeles Subway workers. In a novel approach, CFFWU aims to compel fast food companies to engage in sectoral bargaining by expanding its membership across California’s fast-food industry, without seeking NLRB certification at the establishment level.
Daily News & Commentary
Start your day with our roundup of the latest labor developments. See all
December 22
Worker-friendly legislation enacted in New York; UW Professor wins free speech case; Trucking company ordered to pay $23 million to Teamsters.
December 21
Argentine unions march against labor law reform; WNBA players vote to authorize a strike; and the NLRB prepares to clear its backlog.
December 19
Labor law professors file an amici curiae and the NLRB regains quorum.
December 18
New Jersey adopts disparate impact rules; Teamsters oppose railroad merger; court pauses more shutdown layoffs.
December 17
The TSA suspends a labor union representing 47,000 officers for a second time; the Trump administration seeks to recruit over 1,000 artificial intelligence experts to the federal workforce; and the New York Times reports on the tumultuous changes that U.S. labor relations has seen over the past year.
December 16
Second Circuit affirms dismissal of former collegiate athletes’ antitrust suit; UPS will invest $120 million in truck-unloading robots; Sharon Block argues there are reasons for optimism about labor’s future.