Benjamin Sachs is the Kestnbaum Professor of Labor and Industry at Harvard Law School and a leading expert in the field of labor law and labor relations. He is also faculty director of the Center for Labor and a Just Economy. Professor Sachs teaches courses in labor law, employment law, and law and social change, and his writing focuses on union organizing and unions in American politics. Prior to joining the Harvard faculty in 2008, Professor Sachs was the Joseph Goldstein Fellow at Yale Law School. From 2002-2006, he served as Assistant General Counsel of the Service Employees International Union (SEIU) in Washington, D.C. Professor Sachs graduated from Yale Law School in 1998, and served as a judicial law clerk to the Honorable Stephen Reinhardt of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. His writing has appeared in the Harvard Law Review, the Yale Law Journal, the Columbia Law Review, the New York Times and elsewhere. Professor Sachs received the Yale Law School teaching award in 2007 and in 2013 received the Sacks-Freund Award for Teaching Excellence at Harvard Law School. He can be reached at [email protected].
A major theme in the debate over public-sector unions has been the idea that public-sector workers get paid more than their counterparts in the private sector. Joe Slater has an important new paper that sheds helpful light on this question. Slater reviews the findings of a number of studies on the question of whether public-sector workers get paid more (or less) than their private-sector analogues and he reaches the following three conclusions:
One, a majority of the studies find that “public workers are paid somewhat less than comparable private-sector employees,” but a number of studies find the opposite. Two, there is near consensus that workers at the lower-end of the pay scale (janitors, for example, and landscapers) do better in the public sector than in the private sector. On the other hand, workers at the upper-end of the pay scale (lawyers, for example) do substantially better in the private sector than in the public. Three, public-sector workers get less in take-home pay than private-sector workers, but they “generally receive more generous health and pension benefits” and are also more likely to enjoy some type of job security.
Slater also usefully points out, however, that while public sector workers have better pensions than do their private-sector counterparts, pension levels are not the product of collective bargaining. As Slater writes, “in the overwhelming majority of jurisdictions . . . public-sector pension benefit formulas are not legal subjects of collective bargaining. Rather, almost everywhere, public-sector pension benefit formulas are set by a separate statute governing pensions, and those formulas cannot be changed through collective bargaining.”
Daily News & Commentary
Start your day with our roundup of the latest labor developments. See all
April 5
Trump proposes DOL budget cuts; NLRB rules in favor of cannabis employees; Florida warehouse workers unanimously authorize strike.
April 3
NLRB says Amazon failed to bargain with union; Harvard graduate workers authorize strike, and states move to preempt local employment law.
April 2
Sheridan, Colorado educators go on strike; Maryland graduate student workers are one step closer to collective bargaining rights.
April 1
DOL proposes 401(k) rule; Starbucks investors reelect controversial board members; Washington passes workplace immigration warning requirement.
March 31
In today’s news and commentary, the Supreme Court hears a case about Federal Court jurisdiction over arbitration, a UPS heat inspection lawsuit against OSHA is dismissed, and federal worker unions and NGOs call on the EPA to cease laying off its environmental justice staffers. A majority of Supreme Court justices signaled support for allowing federal […]
March 30
Trump orders payment to TSA agents; NYC doormen look to authorize a strike; and KPMG positions for mass layoffs.