January 24th 2021
Category
Thanks to Ben Sachs for allowing me space for a reply and to Terri Gerstein and David Seligman...
In his recent post, “Rethinking Wage Theft Criminalization,” Ben Levin argues that “the impulse...
Arizona teachers began voting on whether to strike on Tuesday afternoon. While Republican...
Two weeks ago, the Supreme Court decided Encino Motorcars, LLC v. Navarro, one of those...
“Wage theft” is an evocative turn of phrase, but how literally should we take it?
Used to refer to employers underpaying workers or denying them compensation to which they are entitled, the phrase increasingly crops up in conversations about work law and policy. Scholars, activists, and politicians have leveraged its powerful rhetorical force: theft is a crime and thus invokes issues of moral culpability and wrongdoing.
n January 11, 2018, Jon Nash of Emory University School of Law and I submitted comments to the Department of Labor (“DOL”) on its proposed regulation regarding the freedom of employers that pay direct cash wages of at least the Federal minimum wage and do not take a tip credit to engage in the pooling of tips, even among employees who are not customarily and regularly tipped. We are also publishing a forthcoming article on the very subject of the proposed regulation, Samuel Estreicher & Jonathan Remy Nash, The Case for Tipping and Unrestricted Tip Pooling: Promoting Intrafirm Cooperation, 59 Boston College Law Review (Issue No.1, Jan. 2018). Our comments make the following principal points:
The Atlantic reports that the #metoo movement has yet to deliver justice for low-wage workers...
Tomorrow, the National Labor Relations Board will publish a Request for Information in the...
The Province of Ontario is testing the effects of a basic income program on poverty, reports...
The ACLU filed a lawsuit in the Middle District of North Carolina on behalf of the Farm Labor...
Earlier this week, the Office of Management and Budget announced that it was issuing a review...
Fighting the dangers of tobacco, seeking redress for homeowners during the mortgage crisis, and most recently standing up against the Muslim ban – state attorneys general have long been at the forefront of efforts to protect the well-being of the people of their states. In recent months, progressive state attorneys general have emerged as some of the nation’s foremost champions of civil rights and of humane, sensible policy in the face of declining protection at the federal level. As income inequality grows and too many American workers struggle to get a fair deal in our economy, the role of state attorneys general in enforcing statutes that protect workers’ economic interests has taken on new importance. To build on the energy and expertise of these public servants, under the auspices of the Labor and Worklife Program at Harvard Law School, we recently hosted attorneys from the offices of 11 state attorneys general last week to discuss strategies and best practices for enforcing labor laws